Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39952327›Full record

ArticleThe American journal of clinical nutrition2025

Differential association of ultraprocessed food categories with risk of developing cognitive impairment in middle-aged and older adults in a longitudinal panel study.

Elayna R Seago, Maria Lm Rego, Brenda M Davy, Ben Katz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The American journal of clinical nutrition, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Elayna R SeagoDepartment of Human Development and Family Science, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, United States. Electronic address: elaynars@vt.edu.
Maria Lm RegoDepartment of Human Nutrition, Foods, and Exercise, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, United States.
Brenda M DavyDepartment of Human Nutrition, Foods, and Exercise, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, United States.
Ben KatzDepartment of Human Development and Family Science, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, United States.

Funding

HRS Yrs29-34: Y33 SSA CoFundingU01AG009740 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI Jessica Faul, KENNETH M LANGA · 1990 to 2026
$555.8M
Ultra-processed food consumption, gut microbiota, and glucose homeostasis in mid-life adultsR21AG077143 · NIA · VIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INST AND ST UNIV · PI DAVY, BRENDA M · 2022 to 2023
$455k
Influence of ultra-processed foods on reward processing and energy intakeR21HD109722 · NICHD · VIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INST AND ST UNIV · PI DAVY, BRENDA M, DIFELICEANTONIO, ALEXANDRA GOLD · 2022 to 2023
$440k
NIA NIH HHS R21 AG077143NIA NIH HHS U01 AG009740NICHD NIH HHS R21 HD109722
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe majority (∼65%) of food products purchased by United States households are considered ultraprocessed foods (UPFs). Consumption of UPF is associated with a variety of adverse health outcomes including dementia. Most research on UPF consumption and cognition measure UPF as a single entity despite extensive variability in the types of foods that are considered UPF.

objectivesThe objective of this study was to investigate the extent to which consumption of individual categories of UPF are related to risk of developing cognitive impairment over 7 y.

methodsData from the Health and Retirement Study (HRS), a panel study, were used to examine UPF consumption and risk of developing cognitive impairment in 4750 middle-aged and older United States adults. Diet was assessed using the Harvard Food Frequency Questionnaire at baseline and cognitive status was assessed biennially from 2014 to 2020 using measures of recall and executive function. Foods were categorized using the NOVA system. The UPF foods were divided into categories based on previously reported criteria. The relationship between total UPF consumption and 9 UPF categories and cognitive status were assessed using adjusted Cox proportional hazard analyses.

resultsIn total, 1363 participants developed cognitive impairment. Consumption of an additional average daily serving of ultraprocessed animal products and beverages were associated with 17% (95% Confidence interval [CI]: 1.032, 1.326) and 6.3% (95% CI: 1.010, 1.118) heightened risk of developing cognitive impairment throughout the study period, respectively. Total UPF consumption and consumption of other UPF categories (other, sweets, spreads, savory snacks, ready-to-eat meals, grains, and dairy-based) were not associated with risk of developing cognitive impairment.

conclusionsThese results reinforce the value of separating UPF into categories. The link between UPF animal products and beverages with cognitive functions may be, in part, explained by their ingredients, such as additives, or by the poor nutritional composition of products rich in simple sugars and low in dietary fibers.

Indexed as

Cognitive DysfunctionDietFood HandlingAgedFemaleHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleMiddle AgedRisk FactorsUnited Statescognitioncognitive impairmenthazard ratioolder adultsultraprocessed foods

Identifiers

PMID39952327
PMCPMC12107485

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.