Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39951661›Full record

ArticleOtology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology2025

Access to Ear and Hearing Care Globally: A Survey of Stakeholder Perceptions from the Lancet Commission on Global Hearing Loss.

Rolvix H Patterson, Catherine McMahon, Chris Waterworth, Sarah Morton, Alyssa Platt, Shelly Chadha, Mary Jue Xu, Carolina Der, Doreen Nakku, Amina Seguya and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Genetics of Waardenburg Syndrome in Africa: A Systematic Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Rolvix H PattersonORCID 0000-0001-7004-615
Catherine McMahonMacquarie University Hearing, Australian Hearing Hub, Sydney, Australia.
Chris Waterworth
Sarah Morton
Alyssa Platt
Shelly ChadhaDepartment on Noncommunicable Diseases, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
Mary Jue Xu
Carolina DerDepartment on Noncommunicable Diseases, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
Doreen NakkuMbarara University of Science and Technology, Faculty of Medicine, Department of ENT Surgery, Mbarara, Uganda.
Amina SeguyaMulago National Referral Hospital, Kampala, Uganda.
Robert FrostDe Montfort University, Leicester, UK.
Ali JafferHearWell Audiology Clinic, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
Samantha Kleindienst Robler
Susan D Emmett

Funding

Otolaryngology Surgeon- Scientist career Path (OSSP) programR25DC020172 · NIDCD · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI Howard W Francis, Bradley J Goldstein · 2022 to 2026
$1.2M
NIDCD NIH HHS R25 DC020172World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveCharacterize global access to ear and hearing care (EHC) to inform future policy recommendations. STUDY

designSurvey using convenience sampling.

settingSubjects were surveyed via contact lists of the World Health Organization, Global Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery Initiative, and Global HEAR Collaborative.

participantsOtolaryngologists, audiologists, other health care professionals, adults with hearing loss, parents/caregivers of children with hearing loss, and policymakers.

interventionNone. MAIN OUTCOME AND MEASURES: Responses to questions regarding EHC screening programs, workforce, supports, access to care, and government priority by World Bank income group.

resultsThere were 125 included survey responses from EHC stakeholders representing 59 countries: 71% from low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) and 29% from high-income countries (HICs). Compared with respondents from LMICs, those from HICs more frequently indicated that their country had adequate numbers of ENTs, audiologists, SLPs, and EHC community health workers. This trend was consistent across questions regarding number of training programs for EHC workforce, presence of hearing screening programs, cost of hearing aids and cochlear implants, availability of EHC supports and services, affordability of EHC, government funding or investment, and inclusion of EHC in national health strategy.

conclusionGlobally, EHC is limited by systems-level barriers that disproportionately affect LMICs. Urgent policy development and intervention is needed to eliminate these barriers and improve EHC around the world.

Indexed as

Global HealthHealth Services AccessibilityHearing LossDeveloping CountriesHumansOtolaryngologyStakeholder ParticipationSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID39951661
PMCPMC12328032

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.