ArticlePloS one2025
No detectable effect of urbanization on genetic drift or gene flow in specialist herbivorous insects of milkweed.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Multi-City Assessment of Genomic Evolution in the Native WildflowerEvolutionary applications · 2026Article
- A Beginner's How-To Guide to Urban Population Genetics and Genomics.Ecology and evolution · 2026Review
- Were bed bugs the first urban pest insect? Genome-wide patterns of bed bug demography mirror global human expansion.Biology letters · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Urbanization is hypothesized to isolate populations and restrict dispersal, leading to reduced genetic diversity and increased genetic differentiation. We tested this hypothesis in specialist herbivorous insects of milkweed, positing that higher dispersal ability would mitigate the negative effects of urbanization on genetic drift and gene flow, and that these effects would vary with city size. In this study, we collected 383 milkweed insects from urban and rural sites in Toronto, Canada, and five surrounding cities. Using ddRADseq, we generated 145,000 SPNs for monarchs, 10,000 SNPs for beetles, 6,000 SNPs for weevils to quantify genetic diversity, demographic history and population genetic structure. Contrary to our hypotheses, our results indicated no effect of urbanization or dispersal ability on diversity or genetic differentiation. Genetic diversity, measured as π, varied between 0.0013 and 0.0044 across species, with no urban vs. rural component, but with monarchs having >2 X higher diversity compared to beetles and weevils. Similarly, genetic differentiation was generally low, FST varying between 0.01 and 0.28, but there are no consistent trends among urban vs. rural samples for any of the three species. However, demographic analyses revealed a consistent decline in effective population size for all three sampled species, beginning around the last glacial maximum and intensifying over the past 1,000 years. Our findings suggest that both urbanization and dispersal ability have not been a major factor in reducing gene flow or increasing genetic drift among milkweed's herbivorous insect populations. Instead, historical events such as climatic change since the last glacial maximum, and large-scale anthropogenic disturbance in general, have had a more pronounced impact on demography. These results highlight the importance of considering the combined effects of natural and anthropogenic long-term historical processes when studying population genetics in the context of urbanization.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.