Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39951471›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Maternity care providers' experiences of work-related serious events (MATES): An International survey.

Maria Healy, Patricia Leahy-Warren, Jean Calleja-Agius, Neville Calleja, Joan Lalor, Eleni Hadjigeorgiou, Marianne Nieuwenhuijze

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Maria HealySchool of Nursing and Midwifery, Queen's University Belfast, Lisburn, Northern Ireland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3729-7285
Patricia Leahy-WarrenSchool of Nursing and Midwifery, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.
Jean Calleja-AgiusDepartment of Anatomy, Faculty of Medicine and Surgery, University of Malta, Msida, Malta.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6369-0297
Neville CallejaDepartment of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Surgery, University of Malta, Msida, Malta.
Joan LalorSchool of Nursing and Midwifery, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
Eleni HadjigeorgiouDepartment of Nursing, School of Health Science, Cyprus University of Technology, Limassol, Cyprus.
Marianne NieuwenhuijzeResearch Centre for Midwifery Science, Zuyd University & CAPHRI, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6120-4152

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Internationally, many women experience physiological childbirth with positive experiences and good health outcomes for them and their baby. For some, due to health complications and context of childbirth they may experience or be perceived as having had a traumatic birth. Ultimately, whether an individual experiences an event as traumatic or not, is a personal experience. Caring for women who experience their birth as traumatic can be challenging. The risk of exposure to a traumatic birth event(s) as part of maternity care providers (MCPs) work, ranges from 67% to 90%. Thereby to support MCPs to provide quality maternal and newborn care, it is important to explore the impact of work-related events. An anonymised online survey relating to MATernity serious EventS (MATES) was developed utilising validated instruments and hosted on QualtricsXM. Following ethical approval, the questionnaire was disseminated internationally across 33 countries between 1st July and 31st December 2022 via social media and the COST Action DEVOTION (CA18211 www.ca18211.eu) network. In total, 579 MCPs responded with a wide age range and years of experience. Descriptive and inferential statistical analyses were performed, including univariate and multivariate linear regression. Data analyses and management were undertaken using SPSS v.20 and two-sided significance tests were applied (α 0.05). The findings suggest that MCPs are exposed to a large variation of serious events and continue to be intensely affected, up to the present day. Events ranged from stillbirth, neonatal death, maternal death, severe or life-threatening maternal or infant incidents and violence and aggression from women or family member. Institutional support for staff is limited, and when available, seldom used. Family and friends were relied on for support, but this does not appear to be associated with MCPs experiencing less secondary traumatic stress. Subsequently MCPs were absence from work through sickness (22%), changed their professional allocation (19%) and seriously considered leaving (42%). Moreover, many reported low to moderate compassion satisfaction and burnout (65-80%). With international scarcity of MCPs, the impact of these events seem to contribute to this shortage. Effective support for MCPs is required if staff are to be recruited and retained.

Indexed as

Health PersonnelMaternal Health ServicesParturitionAdultFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornMiddle AgedPregnancySurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID39951471
PMCPMC11828367

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.