ArticlePloS one2025
Mixed attention ensemble for esophageal motility disorders classification.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Artificial Intelligence in Gastrointestinal Motility Diagnostics: A Systematic Review.Neurogastroenterology and motility · 2026Pooled it
- AI in Esophageal Motility Disorders: Systematic Review of High-Resolution Manometry Studies.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Pooled it
- Multimodal graph-based classification of esophageal motility disorders.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Esophageal motility disorders result from dysfunction of the lower esophageal sphincter and abnormalities in esophageal peristalsis, often presenting symptoms such as dysphagia, chest pain, or heartburn. High-resolution esophageal manometry currently serves as the primary diagnostic method for these disorders, but it has some shortcomings including technical complexity, high demands on diagnosticians, and time-consuming diagnostic process. Therefore, based on ensemble learning with a mixed voting mechanism and multi-dimensional attention enhancement mechanism, a classification model for esophageal motility disorders is proposed and named mixed attention ensemble(MAE) in this paper, which integrates four distinct base models, utilizing a multi-dimensional attention mechanism to extract important features and being weighted with a mixed voting mechanism. We conducted extensive experiments through exploring three different voting strategies and validating our approach on our proprietary dataset. The MAE model outperforms traditional voting ensembles on multiple metrics, achieving an accuracy of 98.48% while preserving a low parameter. The experimental results demonstrate the effectiveness of our method, providing valuable reference to pre-diagnosis for physicians.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.