Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39951314›Full record

ArticleJAMA health forum2025

Drivers of Variation in Health Care Spending Across US Counties.

Joseph L Dieleman, Maxwell Weil, Meera Beauchamp, Catherine Bisignano, Sawyer W Crosby, Drew DeJarnatt, Haley Lescinsky, Ali H Mokdad, Samuel Ostroff, Hilary Paul and 8 more

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA health forum, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Error in Supplement 1.JAMA health forum · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Joseph L DielemanInstitute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, Hans Rosling Center for Population Health, Seattle, Washington.
Maxwell WeilInstitute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, Hans Rosling Center for Population Health, Seattle, Washington.
Meera BeauchampInstitute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, Hans Rosling Center for Population Health, Seattle, Washington.
Catherine BisignanoInstitute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, Hans Rosling Center for Population Health, Seattle, Washington.
Sawyer W CrosbyInstitute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, Hans Rosling Center for Population Health, Seattle, Washington.
Drew DeJarnattInstitute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, Hans Rosling Center for Population Health, Seattle, Washington.
Haley LescinskyInstitute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, Hans Rosling Center for Population Health, Seattle, Washington.
Ali H MokdadInstitute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, Hans Rosling Center for Population Health, Seattle, Washington.
Samuel OstroffInstitute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, Hans Rosling Center for Population Health, Seattle, Washington.
Hilary PaulInstitute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, Hans Rosling Center for Population Health, Seattle, Washington.
Ian PollockInstitute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, Hans Rosling Center for Population Health, Seattle, Washington.
Maitreyi SahuInstitute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, Hans Rosling Center for Population Health, Seattle, Washington.
John W ScottDepartment of Surgery, Division of Trauma, Burn & Critical Care Surgery, Harborview Medical Center, Seattle, Washington.
Kayla V TaylorInstitute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, Hans Rosling Center for Population Health, Seattle, Washington.
Azalea ThomsonInstitute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, Hans Rosling Center for Population Health, Seattle, Washington.
Marcia R WeaverInstitute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, Hans Rosling Center for Population Health, Seattle, Washington.
Lauren B WilnerInstitute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, Hans Rosling Center for Population Health, Seattle, Washington.
Christopher J L MurrayInstitute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, Hans Rosling Center for Population Health, Seattle, Washington.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Understanding the drivers of health care spending across US counties is important for developing policies and assessing the allocation of health care services. Objective: To estimate the amount of cross-county health care spending variation explained by (1) population age, (2) health condition prevalence, (3) service utilization, and (4) service price and intensity. Design, Setting, and Participants: In this cross-sectional study, data for 4 key drivers of per capita spending were extracted for 3110 US counties, 148 health conditions, 38 age-sex groups, 4 payers, and 7 types of care for 2019. Service utilization was measured as service volume per prevalent case, while price and intensity was measured as spending per visit, admission, or prescription. Das Gupta and Shapley decomposition methods and linear regression were used to estimate the contribution of each factor. The data analysis was conducted between March 2024 and July 2024. Exposures: Age, disease prevalence, service utilization, or service price and intensity. Main Outcomes and Measures: Variation in health care spending across US counties. Results: In 2019, 76.6% of personal health care spending was included in this study. Overall, 64.8% of cross-county health care spending variation among 3110 US counties was explained by service utilization, while population age, disease prevalence, and price and intensity of services explained 4.1%, 7.0%, and 24.1%, respectively. The rate at which these factors contributed to variation in spending differed by payer, type of care, and health condition. Service utilization was associated with insurance coverage, median income, and education. An increase in each of these from the median to the 75th percentile was associated with a 7.8%, 4.4%, and 3.8% increase in ambulatory care utilization, respectively. The fraction of Medicare beneficiaries with Medicare Advantage was associated with less utilization. An increase in Medicare Advantage coverage from the median to the 75th percentile was associated with a 1.9% decrease in ambulatory care utilization. Differences in cross-state spending levels were also attributed to different factors. For Utah, the state with the least health care spending per capita, spending rates were lower for all types of care due principally to the young age profile. For New York, the state with the highest spending, spending rates were relatively high for hospital inpatient and prescribed pharmaceutical spending. For both types of care, high service price and intensity contributed to the above-average spending. Conclusions and Relevance: In this cross-sectional study, variation in health care spending among US counties was largely related to variation in service utilization. Understanding the drivers of spending variation in the US may help policymakers assess the allocation of health care resources.

Indexed as

Health ExpendituresAdolescentAdultAgedAge FactorsCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPatient Acceptance of Health CareUnited States

Identifiers

PMID39951314
PMCPMC11829242

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.