Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39951313›Full record

ArticleJAMA health forum2025

Sale of Private Equity-Owned Physician Practices and Physician Turnover.

Victoria Berquist, Lev Klarnet, Leemore Dafny

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA health forum, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Victoria BerquistHarvard Kennedy School, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Lev KlarnetHarvard Business School, Harvard University, Boston, Massachusetts.
Leemore DafnyHarvard Kennedy School, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Private equity (PE) acquisition of physician practices is increasing, with owners targeting sales, or exits, in 3 to 7 years. Little is known about the association of exit with physician retention and subsequent employment. Objective: To examine whether PE exit of physician practices is associated with changes in physician retention and subsequent choice of practice size. Design, Setting, and Participants: Using data from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Doctors and Clinicians National Downloadable File from December 31, 2014, to December 31, 2020, this case-control study compared employment changes for physicians at PE-exiting practices sold between January 1, 2016, and December 31, 2018 (treatment group), with employment changes for matched control physicians in practices not sold by PE owners but with the same specialty, hospital referral region, practice size, and time period. Physicians billing fee-for-service Medicare during the study period were eligible for inclusion. A difference-in-differences design was used to compare retention between the treatment and control groups in the 2 years before and after exit using a multinomial logit model that adjusted for physician decade of graduation. Data were analyzed from August 1, 2023, to November 9, 2024. Exposure: Exit of a PE-owned physician practice. Main Outcomes and Measures: Physician employment outcomes included staying (continuing to bill through the initial practice), working elsewhere (only billing through other practices), and retirement (no longer billing). Whether a physician left to a join large (>120-physician) practice was also evaluated. Results: Of the 1215 physicians included in the analysis (405 at 70 PE-exiting practices and 810 matched controls; 814 [67.0%] male and 401 (33.0%) were female. Physicians in all PE-exiting practices were typically in practices of more than 20 physicians (471 [65.2%]) and often in the South (373 [51.7%]). Dermatology was the leading specialty (216 [29.9%]), followed by family medicine (94 [13.0%]). Physicians employed in PE-exiting practices were 16.5 (95% CI, 10.6-22.3) percentage points less likely to continue working in that practice 2 years after exit compared with matched controls. There was no significant change in the probability of retirement (0 percentage points; 95% CI, -4.1 to 4.0). Physicians in PE-exiting practices were 10.1 (95% CI, 6.5 to 13.7) percentage points likelier than matched controls to join a large practice of more than 120 physicians. Conclusions and Relevance: In this case-control study, PE exit was followed by an increase in physician turnover and subsequent employment at a large (>120-physician) practice relative to matched controls, notwithstanding similar turnover rates between these physicians and matched controls prior to exit. The increase in physician turnover and consolidation following PE exits has important implications for patients, physicians, investors, and physician markets.

Indexed as

OwnershipPersonnel TurnoverPhysiciansPrivate PracticeCase-Control StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMedicareUnited States

Identifiers

PMID39951313
PMCPMC11829224

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.