ArticleJAMA network open2025
Patients' Trust in Health Systems to Use Artificial Intelligence.
Article in JAMA network open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 48 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
48 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Patient Concerns Regarding Artificial Intelligence Applications in Health Care: Systematic Review and Meta-Synthesis Based on Social Ecological Theory.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Pooled it
- Artificial intelligence in headache medicine: between automation and the doctor-patient relationship. A systematic review.The journal of headache and pain · 2025Pooled it
- Insights into the Complexities of Pharmacotherapy Parameters in Artificial Intelligence Models for Drug Selection, Precision Personalised Medicine and Optimal Therapeutic Outcomes.Pharmaceutics · 2026Review
- Autonomous AI in prostate cancer: the road ahead towards clinical implementation.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2026Review
- Process Improvement Before Artificial Intelligence and Automation: Building Trust With the Understand-Transform-Sustain Framework.Mayo Clinic proceedings. Innovations, quality & outcomes · 2026Article
- Bias and Fairness Across the Healthcare AI Lifecycle: A Clinician-Oriented Review.Balkan medical journal · 2026Review
- Perspectives of Individuals With Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder on the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Therapy and Treatment: Thematic Qualitative Study.Journal of participatory medicine · 2026Article
- Patients' and Providers' Attitudes Toward Artificial Intelligence and Electronic Health Record Use in Deep Phenotyping and Rare-Disease Screening: An Empty Systematic Review.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Trends in perception of generative AI in healthcare by US adult demographics and political identity.Health affairs scholar · 2026Article
- Exploring attitudes and acceptance of artificial intelligence in multiple sclerosis from the patient perspective.PLOS digital health · 2026Article
- Health equity and public acceptance of large language models in healthcare in China: A national population-based survey.PLOS digital health · 2026Article
- Healthcare exceptionalism in patient perspectives on AI: implications for policy and practice.Health affairs scholar · 2026Article
- From Bench to Bedside: The Path Toward Real-World Translation for Artificial Intelligence in Pancreatic Cancer Detection.Korean journal of radiology · 2026Review
- Artificial Intelligence in Peripheral Artery Disease: A Science Advisory From the American Heart Association.Circulation. Population health and outcomes · 2026Review
- Development and validation of the Oxford Attitudes to Artificial Intelligence in Medicine Scale.JAAD international · 2026Article
- Healthcare professionals show high AI enthusiasm but limited knowledge: A cross-sectional study.PLOS digital health · 2026Article
- Public Expectations for Food and Drug Administration Approval of AI-Based Clinical Decision Support Tools: Quantitative Study.JMIR AI · 2026Article
- Financial incentives increase uptake and perceived effectiveness of autonomous medical AI, yet patients still seek human reconfirmation.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Article
- Clinical AI is Not (Yet) Trustworthy-But It Could Be.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- Evaluating Large Language Models for Transparent Quality-of-Care Measurement in Children with ADHD.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.