Trial reportJAMA network open2025
Emergency Department Vestibular Rehabilitation Therapy for Dizziness and Vertigo: A Nonrandomized Clinical Trial.
Trial report in JAMA network open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05122663 (A Pilot Feasibility Trial of Emergency Department Vestibular Rehabilitation Therapy for Dizziness and Vertigo), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Pilot Feasibility Trial of Emergency Department Vestibular Rehabilitation Therapy for Dizziness and Vertigo
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Diphenhydramine, Sodium Bicarbonate, or Combination for Acute Peripheral Vertigo: A Randomized Clinical Trial.JAMA network open · 2025Trial
- U.S. Emergency Department Visits for Dizziness and Vertigo From 2016 to 2022.Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Importance: Dizziness symptoms account for nearly 2 million annual emergency department (ED) visits and present a diagnostic challenge for clinicians. Most dizziness research has focused on improving guideline-concordant care among clinicians, with little focus on developing patient-centered interventions to improve dizziness-related disability. Objective: To examine the feasibility of ED vestibular rehabilitation therapy (ED-VeRT) using a protocolized diagnostic classification algorithm and collection of longitudinal patient-reported outcomes. Design, Setting, and Participants: A pilot nonrandomized clinical trial of ED-VeRT vs usual care for patients presenting to the ED with dizziness at a single urban US ED was conducted from November 16, 2021, to February 6, 2023, with collection of 3-month outcomes through May 1, 2023. Patients were allocated to ED-VeRT or usual care at the discretion of the treating physician. Interventions: Use of ED-VeRT was delivered by an ED physical therapist via a protocolized diagnostic classification and treatment algorithm based on a diagnosis of benign paroxysmal positional vertigo, triggered undifferentiated dizziness, spontaneous undifferentiated dizziness, or unilateral peripheral hypofunction. Main Outcomes and Measures: Feasibility outcomes included participant screening, enrollment, and retention rates to inform the design of a future randomized clinical trial; retention was defined as completing any of 4 follow-up surveys over 3 months. The primary efficacy outcome was change in the Dizziness Handicap Inventory score; the secondary efficacy outcome was change in the Vestibular Activities Avoidance Inventory-9 score. Results: Of 366 patients screened, 125 participants were enrolled (median age, 52 [IQR, 40-66] years, 73 [58%] female, 61 [49%] White), and 105 retained (84.0%) in longitudinal data collection. Sixty-three participants (50.4%) received ED vestibular therapy and were assigned to primary diagnostic classifications of benign paroxysmal positional vertigo (23 [37.1%]), triggered undifferentiated dizziness (14 [22.6%]), spontaneous undifferentiated dizziness (14 [22.6%]), or unilateral peripheral hypofunction (9 [14.5%]). Despite having higher Dizziness Handicap Inventory and Vestibular Activities Avoidance Inventory scores at baseline, ED-VeRT participants reported lower dizziness handicap (difference: -1.68; 95% CI, -11.30 to 7.90) and vestibular activities avoidance (difference: -2.27; 95% CI, -8.40 to 3.86) at 3 months, although these differences were not statistically significant. Conclusions and Relevance: In this nonrandomized clinical trial, ED vestibular therapy was feasibly delivered to patients presenting to the ED with undifferentiated dizziness symptoms. For participants receiving vestibular therapy the findings for dizziness-related disability over 3 months were not statistically significant, pointing to the need for a fully powered randomized clinical trial. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05122663.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.