ReviewCurrent environmental health reports2025
Exposed and Vulnerable: Sources and Health Implications of Chemical Exposures in Neonatal, Pediatric, and Cardiac Intensive Care Units.
Review in Current environmental health reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Endocrine and cardiovascular consequences of plasticiser exposure: a narrative review from the thyroid- cardiac axis perspective.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Review
- Prematurity, Neonatal Complications, and the Development of Childhood Hypertension.JAMA network open · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purpose of reviewExposures to endocrine disrupting chemicals (EDCs) in early life have demonstrable adverse implications on child health and development. Yet, there is a dearth of studies evaluating the potential exposures to EDCs, such as bisphenols, parabens, phthalates, and volatile organic compounds (VOCs), in hospital-based settings among children who are critically ill and/or particularly vulnerable. This narrative review seeks to provide up-to-date evidence on the sources and magnitude of exposure to EDCs in neonatal-, pediatric-, and cardiac intensive care units (NICUs/PICUs/CICUs) as well as resulting health impacts. RECENT
findingsThirty-three studies were included in this review. The most frequently studied and characterized EDCs in NICUs/PICUs/CICUs were phthalates followed by terephthalates and alternative plasticizers. Evaluations of health outcomes resulting from such exposures were scarce, and few studies assessed health outcomes after hospital discharge. EDCs are pervasive in NICU/PICU/CICU settings and pediatric exposure levels are much higher than in other environments. However, the existing evidence has multiple limitations that should be addressed in future work. Specifically, studies evaluating a more expansive array of chemicals, including contemporary and emerging replacements for legacy compounds, are needed, as are studies that consider chemical mixtures. Additionally, few studies evaluated the health impacts of chemical exposures, and their mixtures, in NICU/PICU/CICU settings, especially long-term health outcomes observed after hospital discharge. Such studies could be invaluable in supporting policy as well as development of medical products without toxic chemicals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.