Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39951225›Full record

SynthesisNeurosurgical review2025

Management of cervical fractures in ankylosing spondylitis: a ten-year systemic review of surgical and nonsurgical outcomes.

Gerald Musa, Justina Phiri, Dimitri T K Ndandja, Karina Familia, Rossi E C Barrientos, Bupe M Mwela, Gennady E Chmutin, Andreas K Demetriades

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Neurosurgical review, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Gerald MusaLivingstone University Teaching Hospital, Livingstone, Zambia. gerryMD@outlook.com.
Justina PhiriMedical institute, Peoples friendship University of Russia named after Patrice Lumumba (RUDN), Moscow, Russia.
Dimitri T K NdandjaDepartment of neurological disease and neurosurgery, Peoples friendship University of Russia named after Patrice Lumumba (RUDN), Moscow, Russia.
Karina FamiliaDepartment of neurological disease and neurosurgery, Peoples friendship University of Russia named after Patrice Lumumba (RUDN), Moscow, Russia.
Rossi E C BarrientosDepartment of neurological disease and neurosurgery, Peoples friendship University of Russia named after Patrice Lumumba (RUDN), Moscow, Russia.
Bupe M MwelaLivingstone University Teaching Hospital, Livingstone, Zambia.
Gennady E ChmutinDepartment of neurological disease and neurosurgery, Peoples friendship University of Russia named after Patrice Lumumba (RUDN), Moscow, Russia.
Andreas K DemetriadesDepartment of Neurosurgery, Royal Infirmary Edinburgh, Edinburgh Spinal Surgery Outcome Studies Group, Edinburgh, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cervical fractures in patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS) are complex and carry significant morbidity and mortality due to the progressive rigidity and brittle bone characteristic of the disease. This meta-analysis highlights the management techniques and outcomes of cervical fractures in patients with ankylosing spondylitis over the past 10 years. A systematic review was conducted using databases such as PubMed, Cochrane Library, Scopus, and Web of Science, covering studies published between 2014 and 2024. Outcomes assessed included neurological outcomes, complications, mortality, reoperations, and length of hospital stay. The Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) checklist was used to evaluate bias. Sixty-six (66) articles with 1972 patients were analyzed. The mean age of patients was 57.02 years, with a male-to-female ratio of 9.8:1, p < 0.001. Most fractures occurred at C6- C7 (36.66%) and C5- C6 (27.74%). Posterior fusion was the most commonly performed surgery (40.0%), followed by combined anterior-posterior fusion (28.3%), and anterior fusion (22.9%). Nonsurgical management was reported in 8.8% with a failure rate of 1.2%. The reoperation rate was highest in the anterior fusion group (11.1%), and lowest in the combined fusion group (1.7%). Good neurological outcomes were observed in 63.4% of cases, while poor outcomes were noted in 33.7%. The overall mortality rate was 2.9%. Cervical fractures in ankylosing spondylitis present significant challenges due to spinal rigidity, altered biomechanics, and high complication risks. Posterior fusion remains the most utilized approach, while combined anterior-posterior fusion demonstrates lower reoperation rates. Conservative management, including external immobilization, is viable for carefully selected stable fractures. Prospective studies with standardized outcomes are essential to optimize treatment strategies and enhance patient outcomes.

Indexed as

Cervical VertebraeSpinal FracturesSpondylitis, AnkylosingFemaleHumansMaleReoperationSpinal FusionTreatment OutcomeAnkylosing spondylitisCervical fracturesConservative managementMortalityNeurological outcomesSpine traumaSurgical management

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.