ArticleIntensive care medicine experimental2025
The effect of therapeutic plasma exchange on the inflammatory response in septic shock: a secondary analysis of the EXCHANGE-1 trial.
Article in Intensive care medicine experimental, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Observational
- Early Immune Phenotype-Guided Immunomodulatory Strategies and Intensive Care Outcomes in Septic Shock: A Single-Center Retrospective Cohort Study.Shock (Augusta, Ga.) · 2026Observational
- Plasma Exchange as an Adjunctive Therapeutic Option for Severe and Refractory Antineutrophil Cytoplasmic Antibody-Negative Microscopic Polyangiitis and Granulomatosis with Polyangiitis.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Article
- Cell-free DNA in sepsis: from molecular insights to clinical management.Military Medical Research · 2025Review
- Knowledge gaps in extracorporeal blood purification: what would be required for its successful application in septic shock?Intensive care medicine experimental · 2025Review
- Plasma from patients with sepsis induces release of neutrophil extracellular traps from healthy volunteer neutrophils ex vivo.British journal of anaesthesia · 2025Article
- The application of therapeutic plasma exchange in sepsis and septic shock: A narrative review.Science progressReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundSepsis and septic shock, defined by a profound immune dysregulation, are among the leading causes of death in the intensive care unit (ICU). Despite advances in understanding the underlying pathophysiology, evidence for specific immunomodulatory treatment does not exist to date. Therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) represents an adjunctive treatment approach to rebalance immune homeostasis. In the EXCHANGE-1 trial, we recently demonstrated a rapid hemodynamic improvement, possibly caused by the removal of harmful mediators and the replacement of protective plasma proteins. The aim of this secondary analysis is to further characterize the underlying immunomodulatory effects and to identify biomarkers that may predict treatment response.
methodsThis secondary analysis included patients in early septic shock (< 24 h duration) and a norepinephrine (NE) dose of ≥ 0.4 μg/kg/min. Patients were randomized 1:1 to receive standard of care (SOC) or SOC + one single TPE and plasma samples were collected before and after TPE. Within-group and between group effects of circulating levels of acute-phase proteins [CRP and Pentraxin3 (PTX3)], inflammatory mediators (IL-4, IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, TNF-α, IL-2Rα/CD25) and damage-associated molecular pattern (DAMP) [cell-free DNA (cfDNA)] were analyzed via paired t test or Wilcoxon signed-rank test and a mixed-effects model. Multivariate mixed-effects modeling of NE and lactate reduction was performed to investigate if cfDNA could be associated with treatment response to TPE.
resultsTPE led to a significant reduction in circulating acute-phase protein levels (CRP p = 0.00976, PTX3 p = 0.0001). Pro-inflammatory cytokines, such as circulating TNF-α-, IL-6- und IL-8-levels, were significantly reduced in both groups with no significant difference between treatment groups except for IL-2Rα/CD25 (p ≤ 0.0001). In a multivariate mixed-effects model, rising cfDNA levels over the first 6 h indicated refractoriness to SOC treatment regarding NE (p = 0.004) and lactate (p = 0.001), whereas those receiving TPE demonstrated sustained reductions in both parameters.
conclusionsIn this secondary analysis of the EXCHANGE-1 trial adjunctive TPE is associated with the reduction of acute-phase proteins and IL-2Rα/CD25, however not with the reduction of pro-inflammatory cytokines. This phenomenon could contribute to the observed enhancement in hemodynamics among patients with septic shock. Furthermore, TPE may be particularly beneficial for patients with septic shock who exhibit rising levels of cfDNA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.