ReviewJournal of neuro-oncology2025
Targeted treatment for craniopharyngioma.
Review in Journal of neuro-oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Systemic Molecularly Targeted Therapies for Neoadjuvant and Salvage Craniopharyngioma: A Contemporary Narrative Review.Biomedicines · 2026Review
- Sleep Disorders, Dysregulation of Circadian Rhythms, and Fatigue After Craniopharyngioma-A Narrative Review.Biomedicines · 2025Review
- Characteristics of the blood-brain barrier in pediatric brain tumors.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionCraniopharyngioma is a rare solid-cystic tumor of the hypothalamopituitary region. Two distinct craniopharyngioma types (formerly subtypes), adamantinomatous and papillary, have been described. These tumors often manifest with neuroendocrine dysfunction, vision problems, hydrocephalus, and cognitive changes. Despite efforts to spare vital brain structures, conventional treatments such as surgery and radiation can exacerbate preceding deficits and contribute to permanent neurologic impairment. Recent studies have identified BRAF-V600E mutations in nearly all papillary craniopharyngiomas (PCP), and CTNNB1/Wnt pathway alterations in adamantinomatous craniopharyngiomas (ACP). These discoveries have advanced our understanding of craniopharyngioma pathogenesis and have opened opportunities for targeted biological treatments. PURPOSE: The primary objective of this article is to review the current landscape of targeted treatments in papillary and adamantinomatous craniopharyngioma.
resultsTreatment of PCP with BRAF/MEK inhibition has demonstrated durable tumor response in the adjuvant and neoadjuvant settings in multiple case studies and one phase II clinical trial. Although treatment advances are more limited for ACP, CTNNB1/Wnt pathway inhibitors showed promising results in pre-clinical studies and are under continued investigation.
conclusionThe efficacy of BRAF/MEK inhibition in PCP supports the use of targeted therapy in patients with newly diagnosed PCP. The optimal targeted treatment combinations and their timing, duration, long-term effects, and sequencing with traditional therapeutic modalities have not been established and warrant further study. Targeted therapies represent a significant advancement in the field of oncology, and craniopharyngiomas are viable candidates for these approaches pending further research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39951179What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.