ArticleArchives of dermatological research2025
Photobiomodulation (100 mW) caution applied to tattooed skin: a cross-sectional study.
Article in Archives of dermatological research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Amber LED photobiomodulation versus tranexamic acid for the treatment of melasma: randomized controlled double-blind pilot trial.Lasers in medical science · 2025Trial
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Photobiomodulation is a technique that can modulate cellular processes and promote therapeutic effects, with the vast majority of applications being painless and nonperceptible. This study aims to determine whether tattooed skin influences cutaneous sensory perception during photobiomodulation application. A cross-sectional study. Participants: 30 participants with tattooed skin on some body regions, mainly on the upper limbs. Data collection was performed in a controlled laboratory environment by a previously trained evaluator. Four modes of irradiation were applied to the skin of the participants, and their sensory perceptions were analyzed with the average time and energy for participants to manifest during irradiations of the PBM. The interventions showed statistically significant differences when comparing the different application mode groups in terms of intervention time with the placebo model. There was an average time and energy during the irradiations: cluster 12s (1.2 J), 660 nm 21s (2.1 J) and 808 nm 14s (1.4 J) until the participants manifested. As a limitation of the study, we can describe the non-observation of skin types I and VI according to the Fitzpatrick scale. This study was evident that tattoos may affect cutaneous sensory perception during photobiomodulation irradiation in all application modes, and the first manifestations reported were: warmth, tingling, and heating.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39951172What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.