Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39951061›Full record

ArticleApplied microbiology and biotechnology2025

Establishment of one-step duplex TaqMan real-time PCR for detection of feline coronavirus and panleukopenia virus.

Zhe Liu, Qian Jiang, Yupeng Yang, Ruibin Qi, Haorong Gu, Mengru Chen, Kexin Feng, Honglin Jia, Hongtao Kang, Jiasen Liu

Abstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Applied microbiology and biotechnology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Zhe Liu *State Key Laboratory for Animal Disease Control and Prevention, Harbin Veterinary Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Harbin, 150069, China.
Qian Jiang *State Key Laboratory for Animal Disease Control and Prevention, Harbin Veterinary Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Harbin, 150069, China.
Yupeng YangState Key Laboratory for Animal Disease Control and Prevention, Harbin Veterinary Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Harbin, 150069, China.
Ruibin QiState Key Laboratory for Animal Disease Control and Prevention, Harbin Veterinary Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Harbin, 150069, China.
Haorong GuState Key Laboratory for Animal Disease Control and Prevention, Harbin Veterinary Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Harbin, 150069, China.
Mengru ChenCollege of Veterinary Medicine, Northeast Agricultural University, Harbin, 150030, China.
Kexin FengState Key Laboratory for Animal Disease Control and Prevention, Harbin Veterinary Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Harbin, 150069, China.
Honglin JiaState Key Laboratory for Animal Disease Control and Prevention, Harbin Veterinary Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Harbin, 150069, China.
Hongtao KangState Key Laboratory for Animal Disease Control and Prevention, Harbin Veterinary Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Harbin, 150069, China. kanghongtao@caas.cn.
Jiasen LiuState Key Laboratory for Animal Disease Control and Prevention, Harbin Veterinary Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Harbin, 150069, China. neauljs@163.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7441-3663

Funding

Central Public-interest Scientific Institution Basal Research Fund No.1610302022009National Key Research and Development Program of Heilongjiang No. 2022ZX02B12
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A comparative genomic analysis of feline coronavirus (FCoV) and feline panleukopenia virus (FPLV) was performed. Based on the conserved regions of the two viruses, specific probes and real-time PCR (qPCR) primers were designed, and a duplex TaqMan qPCR-based assay was established for detecting FCoV and FPLV. The results showed high analytical specificity, and no cross-response with other feline viruses was observed. This method is highly versatile and can be used to detect all FCoV strains stored in laboratories and recombinant plasmids constructed according to the sequences of blank FCoV strains in laboratories. The analytical sensitivity of this method in detecting FCoV and FPLV was as low as 50 copies/μL, which is approximately 20-fold greater than that of conventional PCR. The coefficients of variation (CVs) for the intra- and interbatch coefficients of variation were less than 2%. After 75 clinical samples were tested, the percentage of FCoV- and FPLV-positive samples was 5.34% greater than that of conventional PCR methods, a finding robustly supported by sequencing identification. As validated by clinical samples, the method was sensitive, specific, general, and reproducible and holds great potential for the rapid identification and diagnosis of FCoV and FPLV infections, as well as for epidemiological investigations. KEY POINTS: • One-step duplex TaqMan real-time PCR detection method can detect FCoV and FPLV in clinical samples simultaneously and steadily. • Almost all the currently known FCoV and FPLV strains can be detected. • This method has high sensitivity, specificity and generality.

Indexed as

Coronavirus, FelineCoronavirus InfectionsFeline PanleukopeniaFeline Panleukopenia VirusReal-Time Polymerase Chain ReactionAnimalsCatsDNA PrimersReproducibility of ResultsSensitivity and SpecificityDNA PrimersClinical detectionDuplex TaqMan qPCRFCoVFPLV

Identifiers

PMID39951061
PMCPMC11828816

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.