Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39951018›Full record

ArticleJournal of healthcare risk management : the journal of the American Society for Healthcare Risk Management2025

Integrating enterprise risk management to address AI-related risks in healthcare: Strategies for effective risk mitigation and implementation.

Gianmarco Di Palma, Roberto Scendoni, Vittoradolfo Tambone, Rossana Alloni, Francesco De Micco

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of healthcare risk management : the journal of the American Society for Healthcare Risk Management, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Integrating enterprise risk management to address AI-related risks in healthcare: Strategies for effective risk mitigation and implementation.Journal of healthcare risk management : the journal of the American Society for Healthcare Risk Management · 2025
    Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Gianmarco Di PalmaDepartment of Clinical Affair, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, Rome, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-6638-4151
Roberto ScendoniDepartment of Law, Institute of Legal Medicine, University of Macerata, Macerata, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1910-2405
Vittoradolfo TamboneResearch Unit of Bioethics and Humanities, Department of Medicine and Surgery, Università Campus Bio-Medico di Roma, Rome, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9231-9523
Rossana AlloniDepartment of Clinical Affair, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, Rome, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8877-2141
Francesco De MiccoDepartment of Clinical Affair, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, Rome, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8483-3787

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The incorporation of artificial intelligence (AI) in health care offers revolutionary enhancements in patient diagnostics, clinical processes, and overall access to services. Nevertheless, this technological transition brings forth various new, intricate risks that pose challenges to current safety and ethical norms. This research explores the ability of enterprise risk management as an all-encompassing framework to tackle these arising risks, providing both a forward-looking and responsive strategy designed for the health care industry. At the core of this method are instruments that together seek to proactively uncover and address AI-related weaknesses like algorithmic bias, system failures, and data privacy issues. On the reactive side, it incorporates incident reporting systems and root cause analysis, tools that enable health care providers to quickly address unexpected events and consistently improve AI implementation procedures. However, some application difficulties still exist. The unclear, "black box" characteristics of numerous AI models hinder transparency and responsibility, prompting inquiries about the clarity of AI-generated choices and their adherence to ethical benchmarks in patient treatment. The research highlights that with the progress of AI technologies, the enterprise risk management framework also needs to evolve, addressing these new complexities while promoting a culture focused on safety in health care settings.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceDelivery of Health CareRisk ManagementHumansRoot Cause Analysis

Identifiers

PMID39951018
PMCPMC12034305

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.