ArticleEuropean heart journal. Acute cardiovascular care2025
Underrepresentation and exclusion of patients with cardiovascular disease in intensive care randomized controlled trials.
Article in European heart journal. Acute cardiovascular care, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Respiratory Support and Mortality Risk Across the Spectrum of Cardiogenic Shock Severity.Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions · 2025Article
- Moving From the Epidemiology to the Treatment of Respiratory Failure in Patients With Cardiogenic Shock.JACC. Advances · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
aimsThe complexity of the contemporary cardiac intensive care unit has increased due to a growing prevalence of multisystem, non-cardiac illnesses. Despite this increase, patients with cardiovascular disease (CVD) are often under-represented in intensive care randomized controlled trials (RCT). We sought to quantify the representation of patients with CVD comorbidities in intensive care RCTs. METHODS AND
resultsWe searched MEDLINE for trials published from 2007 to 2019 with the five highest journal impact factors in the disciplines of critical care medicine, general internal medicine, and cardiovascular disease. Prospective RCTs in the adult (age ≥18 years), intensive care setting with ≥50 individuals were included. Study characteristics, proportion of patients with CVD and cardiovascular exclusion criteria were extracted independently by two reviewers. We used multivariable logistic regression analysis to identify independent predictors of cardiovascular exclusion and representation. A total of 412 eligible RCTs were identified for analysis, 132 (32.0%) of which included specific CVD-related exclusion criteria with a history of heart failure (29.5%) and of ischaemic heart disease (26.5%) being the most common exclusions. Exclusions were more likely in multicentre trials and varied substantially across study intervention categories. Representation of CVD, reflected by the reporting of any CVD history, was noted in 150 (36.4%) RCTs. Of those reporting, the prevalence of any CVD, ischaemic heart disease and heart failure were 15.7%, 13.2%, and 10.2%, respectively.
conclusionThose with comorbid CVD are both frequently excluded and underrepresented in intensive care RCTs, limiting the application of RCTs to this physiologically complex patient population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.