Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39950968›Full record

ArticleMolecular biology and evolution2025

Genetic and Anatomical Determinants of Olfaction in Dogs and Wild Canids.

Alice Mouton, Deborah J Bird, Gang Li, Brent A Craven, Jonathan M Levine, Marco Morselli, Matteo Pellegrini, Blaire Van Valkenburgh, Robert K Wayne, William J Murphy

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular biology and evolution, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. The Role of Olfaction in Dogs: Evolution, Biology, and Human-Oriented Work.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Alice MoutonDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0598-8789
Deborah J BirdDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8217-8985
Gang LiDepartment of Veterinary Integrative Biosciences, College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7400-5486
Brent A CravenDepartment of Mechanical and Nuclear Engineering, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8474-4856
Jonathan M LevineDepartment of Small Animal Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4233-6579
Marco MorselliDepartment of Molecular, Cell, and Developmental Biology, University of California at Los Angeles, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3351-5791
Matteo PellegriniDepartment of Molecular, Cell, and Developmental Biology, University of California at Los Angeles, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4378-5824
Blaire Van ValkenburghDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9935-4719
Robert K WayneDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3537-2245
William J MurphyDepartment of Veterinary Integrative Biosciences, College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3699-0723

Funding

National Science Foundation 1457106QCBio Collaboratory Postdoctoral FellowshipUCLA Institute
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Understanding the anatomical and genetic basis of complex phenotypic traits has long been a challenge for biological research. Domestic dogs offer a compelling model as they demonstrate more phenotypic variation than any other vertebrate species. Dogs have been intensely selected for specific traits and abilities, directly or indirectly, over the past 15,000 years since their initial domestication from the gray wolf. Because olfaction plays a central role in critical tasks, such as the detection of drugs, diseases, and explosives, as well as human rescue, we compared relative olfactory capacity across dog breeds and assessed changes to the canine olfactory system to their direct ancestors, wolves, and coyotes. We conducted a cross-disciplinary survey of olfactory anatomy, olfactory receptor (OR) gene variation, and OR gene expression in domestic dogs. Through comparisons to their closest wild canid relatives, the gray wolf and coyote, we show that domestic dogs might have lost functional OR genes commensurate with a documented reduction in nasal morphology as an outcome of the domestication process prior to breed formation. Critically, within domestic dogs alone, we found no genetic or morphological profile shared among functional or genealogical breed groupings, such as scent hounds, that might indicate evidence of any human-directed selection for enhanced olfaction. Instead, our results suggest that superior scent detection dogs likely owe their success to advantageous behavioral traits and training rather than an "olfactory edge" provided by morphology or genes.

Indexed as

CanidaeSmellAnimalsCoyotesDogsDomesticationReceptors, OdorantWolvesReceptors, Odorantcribriform platedogdomesticationolfactory repertoire

Identifiers

PMID39950968
PMCPMC11950533

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.