ReviewACS applied materials & interfaces2025
Advancements in Inkjet Printing of Metal- and Covalent-Organic Frameworks: Process Design and Ink Optimization.
Review in ACS applied materials & interfaces, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Lignin-Based Copper Nanoparticles for Green and Flexible Electronics.ACS applied electronic materials · 2026Article
- Low-Temperature Sintering Inks for Printed Bioelectronics: Materials, Mechanisms, and Emerging Ideas.Biosensors · 2026Review
- Smart Bioaerosol Monitoring: Advanced Sampling and Sensing across Environmental, Clinical, and Industrial Domains.ACS omega · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) and covalent-organic frameworks (COFs) are highly versatile materials based on inorganic modes connected via organic linkers or purely via the connection of organic building blocks, respectively. This results in 3-D nanoporous frameworks, which, due to their combination of high porosity and variability of building blocks, can exhibit exceptional properties that make them attractive. Certain applications (e.g., in electronics and as membranes) require a thin film or even a patterned morphology on various substrates. Inkjet printing of MOFs has emerged as a simple and effective technique for the scalable production of a wide range of MOF (gradient) films and patterns on a wide range of substrates according to specific requirements. This review comprehensively reviews the achievements in inkjet printing of both MOFs and COFs. We discuss the different substrates, ink formulation, and hardware intertwined requirements needed to achieve high-resolution printing and obtain desired properties such as porosity, physical-mechanical characteristics, and uniform thickness. Crucial aspects related to ink formulation, such as colloidal stability and size control of MOFs and COFs, are discussed. Additionally, we highlight potential opportunities for furthering the development of inkjet printing of MOFs/COFs and critically assess the reporting of the printing procedures and characterization of the resultant materials. In this manner, this review aims to contribute to the advancements in understanding and optimization of inkjet printing of MOFs and COFs, as this technique holds great potential for diverse applications and functionalization of MOF/COF films and patterns.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.