Observational studyRevista espanola de salud publica2025
[Access to unfunded vaccination and associated socioeconomic factors in a cohort of infants from a health area of the Region of Murcia (Spain)].
Observational study in Revista espanola de salud publica, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- The relationship between socio-economic inequity indicators and 4CMenB vaccination rates in infants and adolescents in Spain: An ecological correlation study.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2025Article
- Vaccinating and non-vaccinating parents' attitudes toward influenza vaccination in children under 5 years old in Spain.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThe vaccines that are not funded by the government could create some inequities among the infants, because some of them do not have as many chances to get that immunization as others. The objective of this paper was to calculate the optional vaccinations coverage in vaccines that are not funded by the government, like meningococcal B and rotavirus, in infants less than twelve months and also to analyse the socioeconomic factors related to the administration.
methodsAn analytical observational study was carried out in two basic health areas of the Region of Murcia in 2022. The cohort consisted of 297 infants born in 2017 selected from a health card. Sociodemographic and socioeconomic data were obtained through an ad hoc questionnaire carried out by telephone to parents and/or tutors. The infant's vaccination status was verified in the Regional Vaccine Registry and OMIap primary care registry. Non-funded vaccine coverage rates and the association with these variables were calculated. The statistical analysis was performed with the SPSS 21.0 program. The odds ratio (OR) with its 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated using binary logistic regression and multiple logistic regression to independently evaluate the association of variables.
resultsThe vaccination coverage against MenB was 49.4% (at least one dose before twelve months) and rotavirus was 56.7% (complete regimen). The variable that was most independently associated with unfunded vaccination was the Spanish nationality of the parents, OR=11.8 (95% CI=5.0 to 28.2), p<0.001 for MenB and OR=7.3 (95% CI=3.5 to 15.1), p<0.001 for rotavirus.
conclusionsVaccination coverage against MenB and rotavirus is significantly associated with the socioeconomic factors studied in parents or guardians.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39950612PMC12128579What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.