Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39950593›Full record

ArticleEcological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America2025

Microbes in reconstructive restoration: Divergence in constructed and natural tree island soil fungi affects tree growth.

Kasey N Kiesewetter, Amanda H Rawstern, Eric Cline, Gina R Ortiz, Fabiola Santamaria, Carlos Coronado-Molina, Fred H Sklar, Michelle E Afkhami

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Microbes in reconstructive restoration: Divergence in constructed and natural tree island soil fungi affects tree growth.Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Kasey N KiesewetterDepartment of Biology, University of Miami, Coral Gables, Florida, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3983-4718
Amanda H RawsternDepartment of Biology, University of Miami, Coral Gables, Florida, USA.
Eric ClineSouth Florida Water Management District, West Palm Beach, Florida, USA.
Gina R OrtizDepartment of Biology, University of Miami, Coral Gables, Florida, USA.
Fabiola SantamariaSouth Florida Water Management District, West Palm Beach, Florida, USA.
Carlos Coronado-MolinaSouth Florida Water Management District, West Palm Beach, Florida, USA.
Fred H SklarSouth Florida Water Management District, West Palm Beach, Florida, USA.
Michelle E AfkhamiDepartment of Biology, University of Miami, Coral Gables, Florida, USA.

Funding

Division of Environmental Biology 1922521Division of Environmental Biology 2030060National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship ProgramSouth Florida Water Management DistrictUniversity of Miami Dissertation Year FellowshipUSDA NIFA Predoctoral Fellowship
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As ecosystems face unprecedented change and habitat loss, pursuing comprehensive and resilient habitat restoration will be integral to protecting and maintaining natural areas and the services they provide. Microbiomes offer an important avenue for improving restoration efforts as they are integral to ecosystem health and functioning. Despite microbiomes' importance, unresolved knowledge gaps hinder their inclusion in restoration efforts. Here, we address two critical gaps in understanding microbial roles in restoration-fungal microbiomes' importance in "reconstructive" restoration efforts and how management and restoration decisions interactively impact fungal communities and their cascading effects on trees. We combined field surveys, microbiome sequencing, and greenhouse experiments to determine how reconstructing an iconic landscape feature-tree islands-in the highly imperiled Everglades impacts fungal microbiomes and fungal effects on native tree species compared with their natural counterparts under different proposed hydrological management regimes. Constructed islands used in this research were built from peat soil and limestone collected from deep sloughs and levees nearby the restoration sites in 2003, providing 18 years for microbiome assembly on constructed islands. We found that while fungal microbiomes from natural and constructed tree islands exhibited similar diversity and richness, they differed significantly in community composition. These compositional differences arose mainly from changes to which fungal taxa were present on the islands rather than changes in relative abundances. Surprisingly, ~50% of fungal hub taxa (putative keystone fungi) from natural islands were missing on constructed islands, suggesting that differences in community composition of constructed island could be important for microbiome stability and function. The differences in fungal composition between natural and constructed islands had important consequences for tree growth. Specifically, these compositional differences interacted with hydrological regime (treatments simulating management strategies) to affect woody growth across the four tree species in our experiment. Taken together, our results demonstrate that reconstructing a landscape feature without consideration of microbiomes can result in diverging fungal communities that are likely to interact with management decisions leading to meaningful consequences for foundational primary producers. Our results recommend cooperation between restoration practitioners and ecologists to evaluate opportunities for active management and restoration of microbiomes during future reconstructive restoration.

Indexed as

Conservation of Natural ResourcesEnvironmental Restoration and RemediationFungiMicrobiotaSoil MicrobiologyTreesEvergladeshydrologymicrobial ecologyplant–microbe interactionsrestorationrestoration ecologysoil microbiomestree islands

Identifiers

PMID39950593
PMCPMC11827290

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.