Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39950585›Full record

ArticleGlobal change biology2025

River Drying Causes Local Losses and Regional Gains in Aquatic Invertebrate Metacommunity Diversity: A Cross-Continental Comparison.

Daniel Escobar-Camacho, Julie Crabot, Rachel Stubbington, Judy England, Romain Sarremejane, Núria Bonada, José María Fernández-Calero, Miguel Cañedo-Argüelles, Carla Ferreira Rezende, Pierre Chanut and 8 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Global change biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Daniel Escobar-CamachoINRAE, UR RiverLy, Centre de Lyon-Villeurbanne, Villeurbanne, France.ORCID 0000-0001-6660-4331
Julie CrabotFreshwater Ecology, Hydrology and Management (FEHM), Institut de Diagnòstic Ambiental i Estudis de l'Aigua (IDAEA), CSIC, Barcelona, Spain.
Rachel StubbingtonSchool of Science & Technology, Nottingham Trent University, Nottingham, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8475-5109
Judy EnglandEnvironment Agency, Horizon House, Bristol, UK.
Romain SarremejaneSchool of Science & Technology, Nottingham Trent University, Nottingham, UK.
Núria BonadaFEHM-Lab (Freshwater Ecology, Hydrology and Management), Departament de Biologia Evolutiva, Ecologia i Ciències Ambientals, Facultat de Biologia, Universitat de Barcelona (UB), Barcelona, Spain.
José María Fernández-CaleroFEHM-Lab (Freshwater Ecology, Hydrology and Management), Departament de Biologia Evolutiva, Ecologia i Ciències Ambientals, Facultat de Biologia, Universitat de Barcelona (UB), Barcelona, Spain.
Miguel Cañedo-ArgüellesFreshwater Ecology, Hydrology and Management (FEHM), Institut de Diagnòstic Ambiental i Estudis de l'Aigua (IDAEA), CSIC, Barcelona, Spain.
Carla Ferreira RezendePrograma de Pós-Graduação em Ecologia e Recursos Naturais, Departamento de Biologia, Universidade Federal do Ceará, Fortaleza, Brazil.
Pierre ChanutSwiss Ornithological Institute, Sempach, Switzerland.
Zoltán CsabaiDepartment of Hydrobiology, University of Pécs, Pécs, Hungary.
Andrea C EncaladaLaboratorio de Ecología Acuática, Instituto BIOSFERA, Universidad San Francisco de Quito, Quito, Ecuador.
Alex LainiDipartimento di Scienze della Vita e Biologia dei Sistemi, Università di Torino, Torino, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-3458-7538
Heikki MykräFinnish Environment Institute, Nature Solutions, Oulu, Finland.
Nabor MoyaInstituto Experimental de Biología, Universidad San Francisco Xavier, Sucre, Bolivia.
Petr PařilDepartment of Botany and Zoology, Faculty of Science, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic.
Daniela Rosero-LópezLaboratorio de Ecología Acuática, Instituto BIOSFERA, Universidad San Francisco de Quito, Quito, Ecuador.
Thibault DatryINRAE, UR RiverLy, Centre de Lyon-Villeurbanne, Villeurbanne, France.

Funding

DRYvER project (Horizon 2020) 869226ERDF (European Regional Development Fund)Fundação Cearense de Apoio ao Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico Nº PS1-0186-00210.01.00/21Make Our Planet Great Again (MOPGA) 2023: Visiting Fellowship Program for Early Career ResearchersMECODISPER Project CTM2017-89295-PUK Environmental Agency SC220011Universidad San Francisco de Quito 17074
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Drying river networks include non-perennial reaches that cease to flow or dry, and drying is becoming more prevalent with ongoing climate change. Biodiversity responses to drying have been explored mostly at local scales in a few regions, such as Europe and North America, limiting our ability to predict future global scenarios of freshwater biodiversity. Locally, drying acts as a strong environmental filter that selects for species with adaptations promoting resistance or resilience to desiccation, thus reducing aquatic α-diversity. At the river network scale, drying generates complex mosaics of dry and wet habitats, shaping metacommunities driven by both environmental and dispersal processes. By repeatedly resetting community succession, drying can enhance β-diversity in space and time. To investigate the transferability of these concepts across continents, we compiled and analyzed a unique dataset of 43 aquatic invertebrate metacommunities from drying river networks in Europe and South America. In Europe, α-diversity was consistently lower in non-perennial than perennial reaches, whereas this pattern was not evident in South America. Concomitantly, β-diversity was higher in non-perennial reaches than in perennial ones in Europe but not in South America. In general, β-diversity was predominantly driven by turnover rather than nestedness. Dispersal was the main driver of metacommunity dynamics, challenging prevailing views in river science that environmental filtering is the primary process shaping aquatic metacommunities. Lastly, α-diversity decreased as drying duration increased, but this was not consistent across Europe. Overall, drying had continent-specific effects, suggesting limited transferability of knowledge accumulated from North America and Europe to other biogeographic regions. As climate change intensifies, river drying is increasing, and our results underscore the importance of studying its effects across different regions. The importance of dispersal also suggests that management efforts should seek to enhance connectivity between reaches to effectively monitor, restore and conserve freshwater biodiversity.

Indexed as

Aquatic OrganismsBiodiversityClimate ChangeInvertebratesRiversAnimalsEcosystemEuropeSouth Americaassembly mechanismsdispersaldrying durationintermittent rivermacroinvertebratemetacommunitytemporal dynamics

Identifiers

PMID39950585
PMCPMC11826973

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.