ArticlePlant biotechnology journal2025
Harnessing novel cytidine deaminases from the animal kingdom for robust multiplexed base editing in rice.
Article in Plant biotechnology journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Enhancing CRISPR-Cas12a base editing in plants with LbCas12a variants and introns.Journal of integrative plant biology · 2026Article
- Coupling of both a transactivation module and a double-stranded DNA-binding domain boosts Cas12i3 variant-based cytosine and adenine editing in plants.Journal of integrative plant biology · 2026Article
- Improving iSpyMacCas9 multiplex genome editing in rice by CRISPR-combo-mediated BBM1 activation.The Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology · 2026Article
- Review
- Double-stranded DNA deaminase DddAGenome biology · 2025Article
- Transgene-free genome editing in citrus and poplar trees using positive and negative selection markers.Plant cell reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
CRISPR-Cas-based cytosine base editors (CBEs) are prominent tools that perform site-specific and precise C-to-T conversions catalysed by cytidine deaminases. However, their use is often constrained by stringent editing preferences for genomic contexts, off-target effects and restricted editing windows. To expand the repertoire of CBEs, we systematically screened 66 novel cytidine deaminases sourced from various organisms, predominantly from the animal kingdom and benchmarked them in rice protoplasts using the nCas9-BE3 configuration. After selecting candidates in rice protoplasts and further validation in transgenic rice lines, we unveiled a few cytidine deaminases exhibiting high editing efficiencies and wide editing windows. CBEs based on these cytidine deaminases also displayed minimal frequencies of indels and C-to-R (R = A/G) conversions, suggesting high purity in C-to-T base editing. Furthermore, we highlight the highly efficient cytidine deaminase OoA3GX2 derived from Orca (killer whale) for its comparable activity across GC/CC/TC/AC sites, thus broadening the targeting scope of CBEs for robust multiplexed base editing. Finally, the whole-genome sequencing analyses revealed very few sgRNA-dependent and -independent off-target effects in independent T
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.