Article in Journal of the American Heart Association, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
2 · The registry
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Christos P KyriakopoulosDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine University of Utah Health and School of Medicine Salt Lake City UT USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9415-1245
Iosif TalebDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine University of Utah Health and School of Medicine Salt Lake City UT USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0029-5019
Konstantinos SiderisDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine University of Utah Health and School of Medicine Salt Lake City UT USA.ORCID 0009-0007-9369-0782
Eleni ManetaDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine University of Utah Health and School of Medicine Salt Lake City UT USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5011-3036
Rana HamoucheNora Eccles Harrison Cardiovascular Research and Training Institute University of Utah Salt Lake City UT USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9404-3866
Eleni TseliouDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine University of Utah Health and School of Medicine Salt Lake City UT USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9350-2282
Ethan KrauspeDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine University of Utah Health and School of Medicine Salt Lake City UT USA.ORCID 0009-0001-2683-9766
Sean SelkoDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine University of Utah Health and School of Medicine Salt Lake City UT USA.ORCID 0009-0008-9084-7307
Spencer CarterDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine University of Utah Health and School of Medicine Salt Lake City UT USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7268-3689
Tara L JonesDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine University of Utah Health and School of Medicine Salt Lake City UT USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4516-9796
Chong ZhangDivision of Epidemiology, Department of Internal Medicine University of Utah Health and School of Medicine Salt Lake City UT USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5014-4331
Angela P PressonDivision of Epidemiology, Department of Internal Medicine University of Utah Health and School of Medicine Salt Lake City UT USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7400-3923
Elizabeth DranowDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine University of Utah Health and School of Medicine Salt Lake City UT USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5324-192X
Laura GeerDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine University of Utah Health and School of Medicine Salt Lake City UT USA.
Josef StehlikDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine University of Utah Health and School of Medicine Salt Lake City UT USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7362-0513
Craig H SelzmanNora Eccles Harrison Cardiovascular Research and Training Institute University of Utah Salt Lake City UT USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9218-4764
Matthew L GoodwinDivision of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery University of Utah Health and School of Medicine Salt Lake City UT USA.ORCID 0009-0001-7315-5287
Joseph E TonnaDivision of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery University of Utah Health and School of Medicine Salt Lake City UT USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8879-2628
Thomas C HanffDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine University of Utah Health and School of Medicine Salt Lake City UT USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3096-1227
Stavros G DrakosDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine University of Utah Health and School of Medicine Salt Lake City UT USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1223-327X
Funding
CTSA UM1 Program at University of UtahUM1TR004409 · NCATS · UTAH STATE HIGHER EDUCATION SYSTEM--UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI RACHEL HESS, Jennifer Juhl Majersik · 2023 to 2026
$21.9M
TRAINING IN CARDIOVASCULAR RESEARCHT32HL007576 · NHLBI · UTAH STATE HIGHER EDUCATION SYSTEM--UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI Stavros George Drakos, Robin M Shaw · 1985 to 2026
$10.6M
Mechanism of Eccentric Cardiomyocyte Hypertrophy Secondary to Mitral RegurgitationR01HL166513 · NHLBI · UTAH STATE HIGHER EDUCATION SYSTEM--UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI Stavros George Drakos · 2023 to 2026
$2.4M
Clinical and Metabolic Signature of Recovered Myocardium in Human Heart FailureR01HL135121 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI DRAKOS, STAVROS GEORGE · 2017 to 2021
$1.9M
Cellular Remodeling in Heart Failure and after LVAD UnloadingR01HL132067 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI DRAKOS, STAVROS GEORGE, SACHSE, FRANK BERND · 2017 to 2020
$1.5M
Optimizing Selection and Management of Cardiac Arrest Patients Treated with ECMOK23HL141596 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI TONNA, JOSEPH EDWARD · 2018 to 2022
backgroundMultidisciplinary teams and regionalized care systems have been suggested to improve cardiogenic shock (CS) outcomes. We sought to identify clinical factors associated with successful outcomes for patients developing CS at an outside healthcare facility (spoke) and being transferred to a quaternary medical center (hub). METHODS AND
resultsConsecutive patients with CS were evaluated (N=1162). Our study cohort comprised 412 patients developing CS at a spoke. Our primary end point was native heart survival (NHS) defined as survival to discharge without receiving advanced heart failure therapies. Secondary end points were survival to discharge, 30-day and 1-year survival after discharge, and adverse events. Association of clinical data with NHS was analyzed using logistic regression. Overall, 246 (59.7%) patients achieved NHS, 125 (30.3%) died, and 41 (10.0%) were discharged after advanced heart failure therapies. Of the 287 patients who were discharged (69.7%), 276 (67.0%) were alive at 30 days, and 250 (60.7%) at 1 year. Patients with NHS less commonly had bleeding or vascular complications or acute kidney injury requiring renal replacement therapy compared with patients who died or received advanced heart failure therapies. Significant multivariable factors associated with NHS likelihood included younger age; shorter length of stay and transfer from a secondary compared with a tertiary/quaternary level of care spoke; absence of cardiac arrest, intubation, or type 3 bleeding; lower vasoactive-inotropic score; higher left ventricular ejection fraction at admission to the hub; and shorter CS onset-to-temporary mechanical circulatory support deployment time.
conclusionsWe identified clinical factors reflecting disease severity and management practices including length of stay and spoke level of care, inotrope/vasopressor utilization, and CS onset-to-temporary mechanical circulatory support deployment time, that might inform the management of patients developing CS at a spoke.
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.
Informing Management of Patients Developing Cardiogenic Shock at a Spoke and Being Transferred to a Hub. · full record | OpenQuestion