ArticleAnnals of medicine2025
Efficacy and safety of tetracycline vs. amoxicillin in furazolidone-based rescue therapy for
Article in Annals of medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Tetracycline for Helicobacter pylori eradication: a narrative review from quadruple to dual therapy.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2026Review
- Characterizing the profile transformation of Helicobacter pylori: increased secondary and multidrug resistance following failed eradication in Ningxia, China.BMC microbiology · 2026Article
- Comparative effectiveness and safety of vonoprazan/amoxicillin-based dual therapy versus quadruple therapy as second-line treatment for Helicobacter pylori Infection: a retrospective cohort study.Clinical and experimental medicine · 2026Article
- Amoxicillin or tetracycline in bismuth-containing quadruple therapy forFrontiers in microbiology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
aimDespite the increasing rates of antibiotic resistance, furazolidone-based regimens have demonstrated promise in
methodsPatients who received BQFT or BQFA as rescue treatment were enrolled in this study.
resultsA total of 342 participants were included. BQFT showed significantly higher eradication rates (modified intention-to-treat: 96.2% vs. 76%; per-protocol: 97.1% vs. 77.8%,
conclusionBQFT exhibits superior efficacy with acceptable tolerability, making it a promising option for patients with refractory
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.