ReviewJournal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.)2025
Evolution of tomosynthesis.
Review in Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Field Emission X-Ray Source Array for Stationary Digital Chest Tomosynthesis Applications.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Image quality comparison of synthesized two-dimensional images and digital mammography in breast tomosynthesis: A quantitative analysis.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2026Article
- Introduction to the Special Issue: Celebrating Digital Tomosynthesis-Past, Present, and Future.Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Tomosynthesis is a limited-angle multi-projection method that was conceived to address a significant limitation of conventional single-projection x-ray imaging: the overlap of structures in an image. We trace the historical evolution of tomosynthesis. Approach: Relevant papers are discussed including descriptions of technical advances and clinical applications. Results: We start with the invention of tomosynthesis by Ziedses des Plantes in the Netherlands and Kaufman in the United States in the mid-1930s and end with our predictions of future technical advances. Some of the other topics that are covered include a respiratory-gated chest tomosynthesis system of the late 1930s, film-based systems of the 1960s and 1970s, coded aperture tomosynthesis, fluoroscopy tomosynthesis, digital detector-based tomosynthesis for imaging the breast and body, orthopedic, dental and radiotherapy applications, optimization of acquisition parameters for breast and body tomosynthesis, reconstruction methods, characteristics of present-day tomosynthesis systems, x-ray tubes, and promising new applications including contrast-enhanced and multimodal breast imaging systems. Conclusion: Tomosynthesis has had an exciting history that continues today. This should serve as a foundation for other papers in the special issue "Celebrating Digital Tomosynthesis: Past, Present and Future" in the
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.