Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39950180›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2025

NEK4: prediction of available drug targets and common genetic linkages in bipolar disorder and major depressive disorder.

Bin Gong, Chenxu Xiao, Yu Feng, Jing Shen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Bin GongThe People's Hospital of Danyang, Affiliated Danyang Hospital of Nantong University, Zhenjiang, China.
Chenxu XiaoDepartment of Clinical Medicine, The Affiliated Jiangsu Shengze Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Suzhou, China.
Yu FengDepartment of Clinical Medicine, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Jing ShenDepartment of Clinical Medicine, The Affiliated Jiangsu Shengze Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Suzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Bipolar disorder (BD) is a mental illness characterized by alternating episodes of elevated mood and depression, while major depressive disorder (MDD) is a debilitating condition that ranks second globally in terms of disease burden. Pharmacotherapy plays a crucial role in managing both BD and MDD. We investigated the genetic differences in populations of individuals with MDD and BD, and from a genetic perspective, we offered new insights into potential drug targets. This will provide clues to potential drug targets. Methods: This study employed genome-wide association studies (GWAS) and summary-data-based Mendelian randomization (SMR) methods to investigate the genetic underpinnings of patients with bipolar disorder (BD) and major depressive disorder (MDD) and to predict potential drug target genes. Genetic variants associated with BD and MDD were identified through large-scale GWAS datasets. For BD, the study utilized a comprehensive meta-analysis comprising 57 BD cohorts from Europe, North America, and Australia, including 41,917 BD cases and 371,549 controls of European ancestry. This dataset included both type 1 and type 2 BD cases diagnosed based on DSM-IV, ICD-9, or ICD-10 criteria through standardized assessments. For MDD, we used data from a meta-analysis by Howard DM et al., which integrated the largest GWAS studies of MDD, totaling 246,363 cases and 561,190 controls. The SMR approach, combined with expression quantitative trait loci (eQTL) data, was then applied to assess causal associations between these genetic variants and gene expression, aiming to identify genetic markers and potential drug targets associated with BD and MDD. Furthermore, two-sample Mendelian randomization (TSMR) analyses were performed to explore causal links between protein quantitative trait loci (pQTL) and these disorders. Results: The SMR analysis revealed 41 druggable genes associated with BD, of which five genes appeared in both brain tissue and blood eQTL datasets and were significantly associated with BD risk. Furthermore, 45 druggable genes were found to be associated with MDD by SMR analysis, of which three genes appeared simultaneously in both datasets and were significantly associated with MDD risk. Conclusion: Our study identified

Indexed as

drug targetsgenetic variantsmajor depressive disorderMendelian randomizationNEK4

Identifiers

PMID39950180
PMCPMC11821612

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.