Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39950175›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2025

Development and validation of the "Adjustment Disorder Scale for Medically Ill Patients - ETAM".

Juan Pablo Zapata-Ospina, Natalia Rodríguez, Ayda Margarita Rodríguez, Jenny García-Valencia, Mercedes Jiménez-Benítez, Nicolás Martínez-Ramos, Diana Restrepo Bernal, Ana Lucía Gallego, Carolina Gómez, Luis Fernando Tabares and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Juan Pablo Zapata-OspinaInstitute of Medical Research, Academic Group of Clinical Epidemiology (GRAEPIC), Faculty of Medicine, Universidad de Antioquia, Medellín, Colombia.
Natalia RodríguezDepartment of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, University of Antioquia, Medellín, Colombia.
Ayda Margarita RodríguezDepartment of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, University of Antioquia, Medellín, Colombia.
Jenny García-ValenciaDepartment of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, University of Antioquia, Medellín, Colombia.
Mercedes Jiménez-BenítezDepartment of Psychology, Faculty of Social and Human Sciences, University of Antioquia, Medellín, Colombia.
Nicolás Martínez-RamosCentro Javeriano de Oncología, Hospital Universitario San Ignacio, Bogotá, Colombia.
Diana Restrepo BernalFaculty of Medicine, Universidad CES, Medellín, Colombia.
Ana Lucía GallegoDepartment of Psychology, Universidad del Norte, Barranquilla, Colombia.
Carolina GómezHospital Alma Máter de Antioquia, Medellín, Colombia.
Luis Fernando TabaresHospital Alma Máter de Antioquia, Medellín, Colombia.
Carlos Cardeño-CastroDepartment of Psychiatry, Hospital Universitario San Vicente Fundación, Medellín, Colombia.
Daniel Camilo Aguirre-AcevedoInstitute of Medical Research, Academic Group of Clinical Epidemiology (GRAEPIC), Faculty of Medicine, Universidad de Antioquia, Medellín, Colombia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Adjustment disorder (AD) is common among medically ill patients, yet current evaluation methods do not address the specific characteristics in this population. This study aimed to develop a measurement scale for AD in medically ill patients in Colombia and to find evidence of its validity and reliability. Methods: This was a scale development and validation study. In the first qualitative phase, items were developed. In the second phase, the content validity of each item was evaluated by patients and clinicians. In the third phase, structural validity, internal consistency, test-retest reliability, criterion validity, and convergent construct validity were assessed. Items were analyzed using a generalized partial credit model within an item response theory framework. Results: The Adjustment Disorder Scale for Medically Ill Patients (ETAM, for its acronym in Spanish) was developed, comprising 20 items that address the free description of stressful situations in the last 15 days and mental symptoms attributed to them. Evidence of content validity was found. The scale was administered to 512 medically ill patients, revealing a three-dimensional structure: 1) "AD Symptoms", 2) "Impact on Self-Care", and 3) "Impact on Desire to Live". Internal consistency was adequate, with McDonald's omega of 0.95 and Cronbach's alpha between 0.82 and 0.92 for its dimensions. ETAM had high test-retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.98). Criterion validity evidence was obtained with an independent psychiatrist's diagnosis, with an AUROC of 0.99, and convergent validity was consistent with hypotheses of correlation with other instruments with similar constructs. Discrimination and difficulty parameters were calculated for each item. Conclusion: The ETAM is a scale with evidence of validity and reliability that can be used for the diagnosis of AD in medically ill patients in Colombia.

Indexed as

adjustment disordersdiagnosisemotional adjustmentpatient reported outcome measurespsychometricsvalidation studies

Identifiers

PMID39950175
PMCPMC11821628

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.