ArticlePaediatric & neonatal pain2025
The Landscape of Pediatric Procedural Sedation in the United Kingdom and Irish Emergency Departments; an International Survey Study.
Article in Paediatric & neonatal pain, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- A comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis of the safety of procedural sedation in pediatric emergency rooms.Italian journal of pediatrics · 2026Pooled it
- Computer vision for pain detection during procedural sedation.Scientific reports · 2026Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Approximately 250 000 children undergo pediatric procedural sedation (PPS) in Emergency Departments (ED) in the United Kingdom and Ireland annually. PPS practice in our setting has not been described as fully as other high-income countries. We aimed to evaluate PPS in EDs in the United Kingdom and Ireland. An online survey was distributed through Paediatric Emergency Research in the UK and Ireland (PERUKI), in June 2020. One respondent per ED completed the survey, including questions on agents, fasting, training, and governance. Of 72 PERUKI sites, 61 (85%) responded, of which PPS was performed in 50 (82%). Internal training packages existed in under half (22/50, 44.0%). Most had a guideline (43/50; 86.0%) and documentation proforma (39/50; 78.0%). Audit databases existed in 24/50 (48.0%). Intravenous ketamine was the most common agent (43/50; 86%), followed by variable concentration nitrous oxide (13/50; 26%). Fasting practices varied widely across sites and agents. We have demonstrated widespread PPS use, but non-standardized practice. This leads to potential issues of risk and variability across agents, highlighting a need for a sedation package in the United Kingdom and Ireland to standardize practice and data collection. We propose development of a prospective ED sedation registry in the United Kingdom and Ireland to facilitate data collection to support research within this area.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.