ArticleFrontiers in medicine2025
Exploration of policy feedback mechanism for healthcare improvement in China: a grounded theory model.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The Benefits of Medical Group Construction for Healthcare Professionals: A Survey of Six Tightly Knit Pilot Urban Medical Groups.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Despite increasing governments' endeavors to improve the quality of medical services focused on patient experience, it has been difficult due to a lack of systematic and replicable theories to guide healthcare improvement. This study aimed to construct a theoretical model of a policy feedback mechanism for guiding healthcare improvement based on healthcare improvement in China's context. Methods: We constructed a theoretical model of policy feedback mechanism for improving healthcare using a grounded theory approach to collect and analyze textual data on healthcare improvement in China. Results: In this study, the theoretical model of policy feedback mechanism for healthcare improvement contained five core modules: multi-level objects, policy context, policy tools driven, policy feedback process, and policy feedback results. At the theoretical level, we innovatively constructed the module of "patient feelings," including "patient sense of gain," "patient happiness," and "patient sense of safety." Practically, we generated a list of ways through the "medical organization behavior" module to enhance patient feelings. Conclusion: This model elaborated a policy feedback mechanism for healthcare improvement. This research provided theoretical and practical support for health authorities to formulate and apply various policies or initiatives to improve healthcare. Theoretically, the model innovated the development of patient feelings in the policy feedback for healthcare improvement. On the practical level, we generated specific strategies for hospitals to enhance healthcare and patient experience.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.