Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39950049›Full record

ArticleJournal of pediatrics. Clinical practice2024

Feeding Method, Nicotine Exposure, and Growth during Infancy.

Edmond D Shenassa, Edoardo Botteri, Hanne Stensheim

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of pediatrics. Clinical practice, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Edmond D ShenassaDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Maryland, College Park, MD.
Edoardo BotteriDepartment of Research, Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway.
Hanne StensheimDepartment of Research, Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To answer 3 questions: (1) Are infants breastfed by smokers at risk of rapid weight and length gain? (2) Is rapid growth during infancy partially attributable to ingestion of smokers' breastmilk? (3) If so, what are the implications for breastfeeding by smokers? Study design: Using data from the Norwegian Mother, Father and Child Cohort Study and Medical Birth Registry of Norway (n = 54 522), we examined changes in weight, length, weight-for-length z-score (WFLZ) during infancy in the context of maternal smoking (0, 1-10, or >10 cigarettes/day) and feeding method during the first 6 months (breastfed, formula fed, mixed fed). We fit generalized linear models, adding a smoking by feeding method interaction term to evaluate the effect of ingesting smokers' breastmilk. Results: Breastfed infants of both light and heavy smokers experienced WFLZ gains of 0.05 (95% CI, 0.01-0.09) and 0.13 (95% CI, 0.07-0.18), respectively. Among mixed-fed infants, only heavy maternal smoking predicted WFLZ gain (0.10; 95% CI, 0.05-0.16). Among exclusively formula-fed infants, maternal smoking did not predict rapid growth. Interaction models suggest that infants ever breastfed (ie, breastfed and mixed-fed groups combined) by heavy smokers gained weight (100 g; 95% CI, 30-231) and length (2.8 mm; 95% CI, 0.1-5.6), attributable to ingesting smoker's breastmilk. Conclusions: Infants breastfed by smokers experience rapid growth; some of these gains are attributable to ingesting smokers' breastmilk. Among infants breasted by light smokers, these gains are within the range of normative growth patterns for healthy, breastfed infants.

Indexed as

breastfeedingbreast milkfeeding methodinfancy growthmaternal smoking

Identifiers

PMID39950049
PMCPMC11824624

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.