ArticleJournal of ambient intelligence and smart environments2020
Using continuous sensor data to formalize a model of in-home activity patterns.
Article in Journal of ambient intelligence and smart environments, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Multi-Resident Number Estimation Method for Smart Homes.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Hands-Free Authentication for Virtual Assistants with Trusted IoT Device and Machine Learning.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Analyzing Sensor-Based Individual and Population Behavior Patterns via Inverse Reinforcement Learning.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Article
- The Indoor Predictability of Human Mobility: Estimating Mobility with Smart Home Sensors.IEEE transactions on emerging topics in computingArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Formal modeling and analysis of human behavior can properly advance disciplines ranging from psychology to economics. The ability to perform such modeling has been limited by a lack of ecologically-valid data collected regarding human daily activity. We propose a formal model of indoor routine behavior based on data from automatically-sensed and recognized activities. A mechanistic description of behavior patterns for identical activity is offered to both investigate behavioral norms with 99 smart homes and compare these norms between subgroups. We identify and model the patterns of human behaviors based on inter-arrival times, the time interval between two successive activities, for selected activity classes in the smart home dataset with diverse participants. We also explore the inter-arrival times of sequence of activities in one smart home. To demonstrate the impact such analysis can have on other disciplines, we use this same smart home data to examine the relationship between the formal model and resident health status. Our study reveals that human indoor activities can be described by non-Poisson processes and that the corresponding distribution of activity inter-arrival times follows a Pareto distribution. We further discover that the combination of activities in certain subgroups can be described by multivariate Pareto distributions. These findings will help researchers understand indoor activity routine patterns and develop more sophisticated models of predicting routine behaviors and their timings. Eventually, the findings may also be used to automate diagnoses and design customized behavioral interventions by providing activity-anticipatory services that will benefit both caregivers and patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.