Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39950016›Full record

ArticleJournal of applied statistics2025

Performance of tests based on the area under the ROC curve for multireader diagnostic data.

Yi-Ting Hwang, Ya-Ru Hsu, Nan-Cheng Su

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of applied statistics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Yi-Ting HwangDepartment of Statistics, National Taipei University, Sancia, New Taipei City, Taiwan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4764-0323
Ya-Ru HsuDepartment of Statistics, National Taipei University, Sancia, New Taipei City, Taiwan.
Nan-Cheng SuDepartment of Statistics, National Taipei University, Sancia, New Taipei City, Taiwan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

One of the main objectives of disease prevention is to lower the healthcare costs and improve the quality of life. To achieve this, reliable diagnostic tools are needed. The diagnostic performance of a tool can be measured by the ROC curve and the AUC. However, some diagnostic tools such as MRI images are not objective, but depend on the interpretation of experts. Therefore, the accuracy of these tools may vary depending on who is interpreting them. To account for possible correlations when multiple readers collect data, Dorfman, Berbaum and Metz (1992) proposed using AUC pseudovalues from the jackknife sampling method and applying them to the mixed model to analyze the diagnostic reagent's accuracy. However, pseudovalues may go beyond the AUC range. Also, the random effect estimate may be negative due to a small number of readers. This paper develops tests based on AUC estimates and gives their asymptotic distribution. Moreover, a two-stage test is suggested to correct for negative random effect estimates. Four tests are created in total and their performance is evaluated by Monte Carlo simulations. The distributional assumption's robustness of these tests is checked, and their applicability is demonstrated by two real data sets.

Indexed as

DBM modelmultireaderspseudovaluesROC curveWald test

Identifiers

PMID39950016
PMCPMC11816630

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.