Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39949950›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of cancer research2025

Establishment and validation of a prognostic risk early-warning model for retinoblastoma based on XGBoost.

Feng Wang, Jian Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of cancer research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Feng WangDepartment of Ophthalmology, Changzhi People's Hospital Changzhi 046000, Shanxi, China.
Jian WangDepartment of Radiology, Shanxi Provincial People's Hospital Taiyuan 030012, Shanxi, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Retinoblastoma (RB) is the most common intraocular malignancy in children, and early detection and treatment are crucial for improving patient outcomes. Conventional treatments, such as enucleation and radiotherapy, have limitations in fully addressing prognosis. This study aimed to establish and validate an early-warning prognostic model for RB based on the XGBoost algorithm to improve the prediction accuracy of the 5-year survival rate in children. A retrospective analysis was conducted on 320 children with RB treated at Changzhi People's Hospital between February 2012 and April 2019. The patients were randomly divided into a training group (n=224) and a validation group (n=96). Clinical data, including age, gender, tumor characteristics, and tumor marker levels, were collected. Prognostic factors were analyzed using XGBoost and Cox regression models, and model performance was evaluated using various statistical methods. No significant differences were observed in baseline data between the two sets (P>0.05). Cox regression analysis identified tumor diameter (P=0.032), IIRC stage (P<0.001), and NSE (P=0.016) as independent prognostic factors. The XGBoost model achieved an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.951 in the training group, significantly higher than the Cox model (P=0.001), while in the validation group, the XGBoost model's AUC was 0.902, with no significant difference compared to the Cox model (P=0.117). The XGBoost model demonstrated high accuracy and clinical utility in predicting the 5-year survival of children with RB. Decision curve analysis (DCA) and calibration curves further confirmed that the XGBoost model offers higher clinical net benefits and superior calibration ability across various thresholds.

Indexed as

cox regressionprognostic evaluationRetinoblastomarisk early-warning modelXGBoost

Identifiers

PMID39949950
PMCPMC11815383

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.