Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39949940›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of cancer research2025

Integrating shear wave elastography and multiparametric MRI for accurate prostate cancer diagnosis.

Wei Jiang, Bingjia Lai, Xiumei Li, Yuanfang Liu, Longjiahui Xu, Shaoyun He, Ming Gao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of cancer research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Wei JiangDepartment of Radiology, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University No. 107, Yanjiang West Road, Yuexiu District, Guangzhou 510120, Guangdong, China.
Bingjia LaiDepartment of Radiology, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University No. 107, Yanjiang West Road, Yuexiu District, Guangzhou 510120, Guangdong, China.
Xiumei LiDepartment of Radiology, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University No. 107, Yanjiang West Road, Yuexiu District, Guangzhou 510120, Guangdong, China.
Yuanfang LiuDepartment of Radiology, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University No. 107, Yanjiang West Road, Yuexiu District, Guangzhou 510120, Guangdong, China.
Longjiahui XuDepartment of Radiology, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University No. 107, Yanjiang West Road, Yuexiu District, Guangzhou 510120, Guangdong, China.
Shaoyun HeDepartment of Radiology, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University No. 107, Yanjiang West Road, Yuexiu District, Guangzhou 510120, Guangdong, China.
Ming GaoDepartment of Radiology, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University No. 107, Yanjiang West Road, Yuexiu District, Guangzhou 510120, Guangdong, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo develop a risk prediction model for prostate cancer (PCa) by integrating Shear Wave Elastography (SWE) with Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging (mpMRI), thereby improving screening accuracy and specificity while reducing unnecessary invasive procedures.

methodsA total of 479 patients who visited Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital between May 2019 and July 2023 were included in this retrospective study, with 162 diagnosed with PCa. The patients were randomly divided into a training set (349 cases) and a validation set (130 cases). The primary measurements consisted of the Young's modulus from SWE, the PI-RADS score from mpMRI, and laboratory indicators such as total PSA (tPSA), free PSA (fPSA), and their densities. A multifactorial prediction model integrating imaging and clinical data was constructed and validated.

resultsThe combined model incorporating SWE and mpMRI exhibited high accuracy and robustness in diagnosing PCa, with area under the curve (AUC) values of 0.92 for the training set and 0.91 for the validation set, significantly outperforming individual indicators (P<0.001). The model achieved a sensitivity of 94.87% and a specificity of 96.12%, indicating superior performance in distinguishing PCa from benign lesions. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis and DeLong's test confirmed that the combined model exhibited the highest diagnostic accuracy, reducing false positives and minimizing unnecessary biopsies.

conclusionsThe multifactorial prediction model integrating both imaging and clinical data provides a more precise and reliable tool for the early diagnosis of PCa, with significant potential for clinical application.

Indexed as

multiparametric MRIprediction modelprostate cancerShear wave elastography

Identifiers

PMID39949940
PMCPMC11815384

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.