ArticleMedicine and pharmacy reports2025
Evaluation of oxidative stress biomarkers for differentiating bacterial and viral infections: a comparative study of glutathione disulfide (GSSG) and reduced glutathione (GSH).
Article in Medicine and pharmacy reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- The oxidative stress paradigm in arbovirus infections: mechanisms and therapeutic insights.Redox report : communications in free radical research · 2026Review
- The Clinical Utility of Serum Biomarkers in the Differentiation and Prognostic Assessment of Viral Meningitis.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Lower serum GPX4 and GSH/GSSG ratio are associated with poor prognosis in severe community-acquired pneumonia.European journal of medical research · 2025Article
- Glutathione and neurodegenerative diseases: immunopharmacological implications.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Review
- Oxidative/Nitrosative Stress and Brain Involvement in Sepsis: A Relationship Supported by Immunohistochemistry.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and aims: This study evaluates the potential of oxidative stress biomarkers, specifically glutathione disulfide (GSSG) and reduced glutathione (GSH), for differentiating bacterial and viral infections. Oxidative stress plays a crucial role in the immune response, and glutathione is a key regulator of cellular redox balance. The aim was to assess whether differences in GSH and GSSG levels could be used as diagnostic markers for infection type. Methods: A chemiluminescence-based method evaluated GSH and GSSG as potential biomarkers for distinguishing between bacterial and viral infections. The GSH and GSSG concentrations were analyzed across bacterial, viral, and control groups. Results: Our data revealed significant differences in the GSH/GSSG ratio between the analyzed groups, with bacterial infections showing higher oxidative stress markers compared to viral infections. A combined analysis of GSH and GSSG concentrations, visualized through heatmaps and ROC curves, improved diagnostic accuracy, with clustering patterns distinguishing infection types. Conclusions: These findings suggest that the GSH/GSSG ratio could be used as a biomarker in distinguishing between bacterial and viral infections, offering potential clinical applications for more accurate diagnosis. Further research is required to validate these results in larger cohorts and to explore the underlying mechanisms of oxidative stress in pathogen-specific immune responses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.