Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39949919›Full record

ArticleMedicine and pharmacy reports2025

Evaluation of oxidative stress biomarkers for differentiating bacterial and viral infections: a comparative study of glutathione disulfide (GSSG) and reduced glutathione (GSH).

Zaki Milhelm, Oana Zanoaga, Laura Pop, Andrada Iovita, Paul Chiroi, Antonia Harangus, Cristina Cismaru, Cornelia Braicu, Ioana Berindan-Neagoe

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medicine and pharmacy reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. The oxidative stress paradigm in arbovirus infections: mechanisms and therapeutic insights.Redox report : communications in free radical research · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Zaki MilhelmCounty Hospital Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
Oana ZanoagaResearch Center for Functional Genomics, Biomedicine and Translational Medicine, Iuliu Hatieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj -Napoca, Romania.
Laura PopResearch Center for Functional Genomics, Biomedicine and Translational Medicine, Iuliu Hatieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj -Napoca, Romania.
Andrada IovitaResearch Center for Functional Genomics, Biomedicine and Translational Medicine, Iuliu Hatieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj -Napoca, Romania.
Paul ChiroiResearch Center for Functional Genomics, Biomedicine and Translational Medicine, Iuliu Hatieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj -Napoca, Romania.
Antonia HarangusResearch Center for Functional Genomics, Biomedicine and Translational Medicine, Iuliu Hatieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj -Napoca, Romania.
Cristina CismaruClinical Hospital of Infectious Diseases of Cluj-Napoca, Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
Cornelia BraicuResearch Center for Functional Genomics, Biomedicine and Translational Medicine, Iuliu Hatieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj -Napoca, Romania.
Ioana Berindan-NeagoeResearch Center for Functional Genomics, Biomedicine and Translational Medicine, Iuliu Hatieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj -Napoca, Romania.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and aims: This study evaluates the potential of oxidative stress biomarkers, specifically glutathione disulfide (GSSG) and reduced glutathione (GSH), for differentiating bacterial and viral infections. Oxidative stress plays a crucial role in the immune response, and glutathione is a key regulator of cellular redox balance. The aim was to assess whether differences in GSH and GSSG levels could be used as diagnostic markers for infection type. Methods: A chemiluminescence-based method evaluated GSH and GSSG as potential biomarkers for distinguishing between bacterial and viral infections. The GSH and GSSG concentrations were analyzed across bacterial, viral, and control groups. Results: Our data revealed significant differences in the GSH/GSSG ratio between the analyzed groups, with bacterial infections showing higher oxidative stress markers compared to viral infections. A combined analysis of GSH and GSSG concentrations, visualized through heatmaps and ROC curves, improved diagnostic accuracy, with clustering patterns distinguishing infection types. Conclusions: These findings suggest that the GSH/GSSG ratio could be used as a biomarker in distinguishing between bacterial and viral infections, offering potential clinical applications for more accurate diagnosis. Further research is required to validate these results in larger cohorts and to explore the underlying mechanisms of oxidative stress in pathogen-specific immune responses.

Indexed as

bacterial infectionbiomarkerglutathione disulfidereduced glutathioneviral infection

Identifiers

PMID39949919
PMCPMC11817587

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.