ArticleMedicine and pharmacy reports2025
Patient - prosthesis mismatch and its influence on immediate postoperative Von Willebrand factor levels in aortic valve replacement surgery.
Article in Medicine and pharmacy reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and aims: Aortic stenosis (AS) often requires surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR). Patient-prosthesis mismatch (PPM) can lead to suboptimal outcomes. Von Willebrand factor (VWF), crucial for hemostasis, is altered in AS patients. As part of an ongoing study, this research focuses on the impact of PPM on immediate postprocedural VWF levels in SAVR patients, building upon our previous publication on short-term VWF dynamics in SAVR and TAVR. Methods: This prospective study included 31 consecutive patients with severe AS undergoing SAVR. Preoperative and postoperative VWF levels were measured. PPM was assessed based on the indexed effective orifice area of the implanted valve. Results: PPM was observed in 61.29% of patients. Postoperative VWF antigen levels increased significantly (131.37 ± 64.82 IU/dL to 311.01 IU/dL, p<0.01). However, PPM did not significantly influence postoperative VWF antigen levels (285.43 IU/dL vs. 293.30 IU/dL, p=0.88), VWF activity (178.33% vs. 204.76%, p=0.56), or Factor VIII levels (100.38 IU/dL vs. 97.10 IU/dL, p=0.79). Conclusions: While SAVR led to increased VWF levels, PPM did not impact short-term VWF dynamics. This study provides insights into PPM and VWF relationships in SAVR patients, informing valve selection and perioperative management strategies. A future paper will reveal long-term follow-up results, completing this comprehensive investigation of VWF dynamics in aortic valve interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.