ArticleNeurology. Education2025
Education Research: A Qualitative Analysis of Communication-Focused Feedback Provided to Child Neurology Residents During an Objective Structured Clinical Examination.
Article in Neurology. Education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Education Research: The Future of Child Neurology Residency Training: The Perspective of a Child Neurology Society Task Force.Neurology. Education · 2026Article
- Characterizing clinician communication with patients about lecanemab: A qualitative study of clinicians across seven academic medical centers.Alzheimer's & dementia (New York, N. Y.)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Objectives: Child neurology is a specialty with unique challenges in communication. Child neurologists face many complex disorders with a wide array of prognoses and treatments as well as the need to communicate at various developmental levels. Limited literature exists regarding effective communication training during child neurology residency. Our aim was to evaluate feedback provided to child neurology residents by standardized patients (SPs) and faculty during a communication-focused objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) for common themes and identify which elements of communication feedback are most valuable to the residents. Methods: The child neurology residency at Nationwide Children's Hospital previously developed a set of OSCE cases to assess residents' communication skills. Using a qualitative approach, we used content analysis to identify themes from the feedback residents received from SPs and faculty observers. After themes were identified, we held a focus group with residents to determine which themes contained helpful feedback. Results: Residents found feedback from both SPs and faculty observers to be important, and how information was delivered was identified as the most impactful type of feedback. Residents appreciated positive feedback from SPs and faculty, especially when aimed at reinforcing a specific behavior that was performed well. Feedback that residents identified as particularly helpful, although not commonly provided, was the recognition of a potential unconscious bias in an encounter. Feedback the residents found less useful was discussing the medical specifics of the case. The most frequently provided types of feedback were not necessarily the most helpful feedback for both SP and faculty feedback. Discussion: OSCEs can be an effective tool to provide child neurology residents with immediate feedback on their communication skills with difficult conversations in a safe environment. Residents find value in feedback from both the SPs and faculty observers. Certain elements of feedback are more helpful than others. This knowledge could be used to develop an assessment tool to guide feedback from child neurology-specific communication simulation.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.