ReviewNeurology. Education2025
Creating a Pipeline of Talent to Feed the Growth of Neuroscience: Lessons From Ghana.
Review in Neurology. Education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The fields of science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) are crucial for innovation and societal advancement. However, gender disparities persist, particularly in neuroscience. This is despite the work of many organizations and initiatives to build capacity among students, with very little done to raise awareness about potential neuroscience careers. In Ghana, the model of neuroscience experiential days targeted at teenage girls is being used to address this gap and ignite an interest around neuroscience. Since 2017, these camps have combined hands-on activities with career talks, reaching hundreds of participants and fostering a community of young women interested in neuroscience. This article shares insights from these camps, highlighting their structure, impact, and the challenges faced. By sharing our experiences and providing recommendations, we aim to inspire similar initiatives contributing to increased gender diversity in STEM.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.