ArticleAlzheimer's & dementia (New York, N. Y.)
Assessing the clinical meaningfulness of slowing CDR-SB progression with disease-modifying therapies for Alzheimer's disease.
Article in Alzheimer's & dementia (New York, N. Y.). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cognitive Outcomes After Hip Fracture Surgery: The Association of Postoperative Delirium on Previously Cognitively Normal Older Adults.The American journal of geriatric psychiatry : official journal of the American Association for Geriatric Psychiatry · 2026Trial
- Validity of the two different scoring methods of the Clinical Dementia Rating scale in staging and detection of cognitive impairment in the Peruvian population.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2026Article
- Provider and patient perspectives on the diagnosis and treatment of Alzheimer's disease: A global perspective from the Global Alzheimer's Leadership Series (GoALS).Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2026Article
- Sensitivity comparison of longitudinal cognitive function indicators of Alzheimer's disease after mild cognitive impairment: a prospective cohort study.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Clinical meaningfulness of anti-amyloid therapies in early Alzheimer's disease: Perspectives from the East and Southeast Asia region.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2026Review
- The Knight Alzheimer Research Imaging (KARI) dataset: a comprehensive multimodal resource for exploring aging, preclinical, and symptomatic Alzheimer disease pathology.Research square · 2025Article
- Plasma tau biomarkers for biological staging of Alzheimer's disease.Nature aging · 2025Article
- Clinical progression on CDR-SB©: Progression-free time at each 0.5 unit level in dominantly inherited and sporadic Alzheimer's disease populations.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2025Article
- Updates on Disease-Modifying Therapy for Alzheimer's Dementia: Options for Delawareans.Delaware journal of public health · 2025Article
- Maximizing the benefit and managing the risk of anti-amyloid monoclonal antibody therapy for Alzheimer's disease: Strategies and research directions.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2025Review
- 2'-Fucosyllactose mitigates cognitive deficits in Alzheimer models: targeting amyloid pathology, oxidative stress, and synaptic plasticity.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Article
- Disease Modifying Monoclonal Antibodies and Symptomatic Pharmacological Treatment for Alzheimer's Disease.Biomedicines · 2024Review
- Assessing the clinical meaningfulness of slowing CDR-SB progression with disease-modifying therapies for Alzheimer's disease.Alzheimer's & dementia (New York, N. Y.)Article
- Simulation of long-term lecanemab treatment effect on Alzheimer's disease progression.Alzheimer's & dementia (New York, N. Y.)Article
- MMSE-CDR-SB residual as an exploratory indicator of deviation from an Alzheimer's disease-typical cognitive-functional pattern.Alzheimer's & dementia (Amsterdam, Netherlands)Article
- Anti-amyloid treatments: Why we think they are worth it.Alzheimer's & dementia (New York, N. Y.)Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionFor many patients and caregivers, a major goal of disease-modifying treatments (DMTs) for Alzheimer's disease (AD) dementia is to extend independence in instrumental and basic activities of daily living (IADLs and BADLs). The goal of this study was to estimate the effect of treatments on the time remaining independent in IADLs and BADLs.
methodsParticipants at the Knight Alzheimer Disease Research Center (Knight ADRC) who met eligibility criteria for recent DMT trials were studied: age ≥60 years at baseline, clinical diagnosis of very mild or mild AD dementia (global Clinical Dementia Rating [CDR] score 0.5 or 1), biomarker confirmation of amyloid pathology, and at least one follow-up CDR assessment within 5 years. For IADLs, a subset of the Functional Assessment Questionnaire (FAQ) was examined that rated the degree of independence in the following: paying bills, driving, remembering medications and appointments, and preparing meals. For BADLs, the Personal Care domain of the CDR was used. Mixed-effects logistic and ordinal regression models were used to examine the relationship between CDR Sum of Boxes (CDR-SB) and the individual functional outcomes and their components. The change in CDR-SB over time was estimated with linear mixed-effects models.
resultsA total of 282 participants were followed for an average of 2.9 years (standard deviation [SD] 1.3 years). For 50% of individuals, loss of independence in IADLs occurred at CDR-SB >4.5 and in BADLs at CDR-SB >11.5. For individuals with a baseline CDR-SB = 2, treatment with lecanemab would extend independence in IADLs for 10 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 4-18 months) and treatment with donanemab in the low/medium tau group would extend independence in IADLs by 13 months (95% CI 6-24 months). DISCUSSION: Independence in ADLs can be related to CDR-SB and used to demonstrate the effect of AD treatments in extending the time of independent function, a meaningful outcome for patients and their families. Highlights: We estimated time to loss of independence for people with AD dementiaEstimating time to loss of independence can help with clinical decision-makingDisease-modifying treatments for AD dementia can extend independence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.