Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39949869›Full record

ArticleCEUR workshop proceedings.2022

Performance Summary Display Ontology: Feedback intervention content, delivery, and interpreted information.

Zach Landis-Lewis, Cooper Stansbury, John Rincón, Colin Gross

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in CEUR workshop proceedings., 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Precision feedback: A conceptual model.Learning health systems · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Zach Landis-LewisUniversity of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9117-9338
Cooper StansburyUniversity of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2413-8314
John RincónHarvard Medical School, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1584-3943
Colin GrossUniversity of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7061-5073

Funding

A scalable service to improve health care quality through precision audit and feedbackR01LM013894 · NLM · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI LANDIS-LEWIS, ZACHARY · 2021 to 2024
$1.3M
A knowledge-based message tailoring systemK01LM012528 · NLM · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI LANDIS-LEWIS, ZACHARY · 2017 to 2019
$523k
NLM NIH HHS K01 LM012528NLM NIH HHS R01 LM013894
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Feedback loops are vital for decision-making and behavior change in health systems, but not all feedback is of equal value. Clinical performance feedback to healthcare professionals and teams has potential for large effects on clinical practice, but evidence suggests that low-value performance feedback is widespread. A primary barrier to understanding the value of feedback loops in health systems may be a lack of a well-defined model and shared semantics for the information that they carry. An ontology for audit and feedback research may be used to address these issues by standardizing feedback intervention metadata. Research describing feedback interventions recognizes differences between the content of the feedback and its delivery process. However, terms describing feedback intervention content are inconsistent, and appear to vary considerably between audit and feedback frameworks, which can result in confusion around what is being delivered in a performance summary. Our objective was to develop an ontology of a performance summary in a clinical performance feedback intervention for the purposes of standardizing metadata. We developed the Performance Summary Display Ontology (PSDO) iteratively by 1) identifying terms for classes from behavior change theories relating to feedback interventions and cognitive theories of visualization, 2) searching for relevant existing ontologies and classes, and 3) using the terms to specify information content and visual displays in published examples of dashboard displays and feedback reports. PSDO is a lightweight application ontology that specifies performance information content and its representations for the purpose of feedback intervention research and evaluation. PSDO contains 3 primary domains: 1) Performance information content, based on constructs from behavior change theories, 2) Marks and their qualities, based on constructs from visualization theories, and 3) roles that link marks, information content, and other emergent characteristics, as interpreted information. PSDO may enable standardization of metadata for the study of feedback interventions.

Indexed as

audit and feedbackbehavior changefeedback interventionquality improvementvisualization

Identifiers

PMID39949869
PMCPMC11825144

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.