ArticleAntimicrobial stewardship & healthcare epidemiology : ASHE2024
Cultures for acid-fast bacilli: are we being good stewards?
Article in Antimicrobial stewardship & healthcare epidemiology : ASHE, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A myco-management problem: improving utilization of fungal and mycobacterial smear and culture.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To describe the use of cultures for acid-fast bacilli (AFB) and situations in which AFB cultures are unlikely to be of clinical benefit. Design: Retrospective descriptive study of AFB cultures submitted to Sentara Health microbiology laboratory from December 1, 2021, to December 1, 2023. Data were collected from the electronic medical record and included patient demographics, the service line that ordered the culture, specimen source, and culture results. Setting: Sentara Healthcare System. Patients: All patients who had specimens submitted to the microbiology laboratory during the study period were included. Results: A total of 13,944 AFB cultures from 8,243 patients were collected during the study period. Of these, 4.72% (n = 389) patients had a positive result, and 40 of 680 positive cultures were likely contaminants or non-mycobacterial. The average number of days between culture collection and positive results was 84.32 days (SD = 49.64) and 56.25 days (SD = 8.32) for negative results. Most cultures were ordered by medical subspecialties (44.06%, n = 6,144), followed by orthopedic providers (23.34%, n = 3,254) and surgical subspecialty providers (16.11%, n = 2,246). Most specimens were pulmonary (n = 6,620) with 619 (9.35%) positive cultures. Of 3,561 AFB cultures ordered from bone specimens, only 17 were positive (0.48%). The number of specimens processed by the microbiology laboratory required 2 full-time microbiology technicians to process specimens. Conclusions: Many AFB cultures were sent from patients who did not have clinical scenarios consistent with mycobacterial disease and cultures were not clinically indicated. Implementation of testing criteria could decrease AFB cultures and healthcare costs.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.