ArticleDigital health
Process evaluation of technologically assisted senior care using mixed methods: Results of the virtual assisted living (VAL, German: VBW Virtuell Betreutes Wohnen) project.
Article in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Technologically assisted support systems and social support in everyday life can help senior citizens live longer independently in their homes. The purpose of this process evaluation is to investigate an innovative care model integrating monitoring technology with social support services, aimed at enabling senior citizens to live independently and extend their longevity in their homes. Methods: Data collection of this mixed-method study was conducted through three distinct sources: expert interviews with employees of the participating social service, focus groups with seniors participating in the intervention, and involved consortium partners in the project. Following Kuckartz's methodology, we employed a structural qualitative content analysis using MAXQDA software. Additionally, a portion of the standardized survey administered post-intervention to participants was analyzed using descriptive statistics. Results: The focus groups identified key challenges related to technical implementation such as false alarms and the failure of sensors as well as communication between invested parties. However, significant potential was noted in the practical execution of the intervention and social care. Interview participants emphasized the need for improved technical implementation. Results from the questionnaires indicate a generally positive perception of the intervention, particularly regarding its social dimensions. Conclusions: Surveying individuals who implement and utilize assistive technology can yield valuable insights into its effectiveness. Additionally, it is crucial to comprehensively and in detail capture the experiences of those involved in testing new care models. Future research on assistive technologies for older adults should integrate both technical and social support components, while also addressing secure data protection measures and the paradox of reassurance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.