ArticleChinese herbal medicines2025
Innovation theory, technical methods and industrial application of quality marker of traditional Chinese medicine.
Article in Chinese herbal medicines, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Chemical components and pharmacological action forChinese herbal medicines · 2026Review
- An integrated strategy for screening Q-markers and elucidating anti-fibrotic mechanisms of Ganoderma lucidum.BMC complementary medicine and therapies · 2026Article
- Anti-Inflammatory Activities of Baobab Fruit Extracts in TNF-Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Chinese medicine-based interventions in triple-negative breast cancer: mechanistic evidence, clinical findings, and translational challenges-a narrative review.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Review
- Genome-wide identification and expression analyses of HSP90 genes in cassava (Manihot esculenta).Journal, genetic engineering & biotechnology · 2025Review
- Research progress on phytochemistry and pharmacology ofFrontiers in pharmacology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Quality marker (Q-Marker) of traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) is a new concept of TCM quality research. Since it was proposed in 2016, it has aroused wide response from the industry and has become an innovative theory and technical method leading the quality research and quality control of TCM. This paper summarized the core connotation, theoretical basis and innovative value of Q-Marker, proposed the technical strategies and paths of the Q-Marker research, and showed the prospect of its application in the TCM industry. The paper provides references for TCM quality research, quality evaluation, quality control and scientific supervision and has important significance for promoting the quality standard and quality control level of TCM.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.