ArticleFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology2025
Retrospective analysis of 300 microbial cell-free DNA sequencing results in routine blood stream infection diagnostics.
Article in Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Next-generation sequencing of cell-free microbial DNA in blood samples of critically ill children: a single-center experience.Molecular and cellular pediatrics · 2026Article
- Homogeneity Between Cervical and Vaginal Microbiomes and the Diagnostic Limitations of 16S Sequencing for STI Pathogens at Higher Ct Values.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Bloodstream infections are a critical challenge worldwide due to the slow turnaround time of conventional microbiological tests for detecting bacteremia in septic patients. Noscendo GmbH (Duisburg, Germany) has developed the CE/IVD pipeline DISQVER for clinical metagenomics testing based on cell-free DNA (cfDNA) from blood samples to address this issue. Methods: We conducted a retrospective study to evaluate the diagnostic utility of this methodological setup in improving treatment decisions since it was introduced into our clinical setting. Between January 2021 and June 2022, the first 300 cases in which DISQVER was applied at our university hospital were collected and analyzed. The results were compared with routine microbiology test results, clinical picture, associated treatment decisions, and clinical course. Results: Our findings demonstrate that DISQVER results where no pathogen was reported effectively ruled out bacterial bloodstream infections, whereas positive results varied in their usefulness. While the metagenomic approach proved highly valuable for detecting non-culturable and rare pathogens, its utility was limited in cases where detected microorganisms were commonly associated with the microbiota. Discussion: Performing on-site analysis might mitigate delays resulting from logistical challenges and might help optimizing antibiotic stewardship. Once prompt results can be obtained, the relevance of incorporating molecular resistograms will become more pronounced. Further, the specific patient subgroups that most benefit from this analysis must be worked out. Guiding clinicians in identifying the infection focus based on the detected bacteria would significantly improve patient care. Lastly, evidence of filamentous fungi must be diligently followed up.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.