Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39949669›Full record

ArticleJournal of oral and maxillofacial pathology : JOMFP

Effect of varying tobacco habits on salivary flow rate, pH and taste perception.

Pearl Gupta, Aparna Dave, Pulin Saluja, Manpreet Arora

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of oral and maxillofacial pathology : JOMFP. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Pearl GuptaDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology and Oral Microbiology, SGT Dental College, Gurugram, Haryana, India.
Aparna DaveDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology and Oral Microbiology, SGT Dental College, Gurugram, Haryana, India.
Pulin SalujaDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology and Oral Microbiology, SGT Dental College, Gurugram, Haryana, India.
Manpreet AroraDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology and Oral Microbiology, SGT Dental College, Gurugram, Haryana, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Smoking and smokeless form of tobacco consumption is highly prevalent among the adult population worldwide. Tobacco use has an adverse effect on oral health. It may contribute to an impaired salivary flow rate and influence salivary pH and taste perception. Aim: To evaluate the effects of tobacco on salivary flow rate, salivary pH and taste perception. Objective: To evaluate salivary flow rate, pH and taste perception in tobacco chewers and tobacco smokers. Materials and Method: Sixty subjects were selected from the patients attending Dental OPD. Group A included 20 subjects who has the habit of chewing tobacco for a minimum period of 5 years. Group B included 20 subjects who has the habit of smoking tobacco for at least a period of 5 years. Group C included 20 healthy individuals who did not have habit of chewing or smoking tobacco, and they formed the control group. Results: On comparing salivary pH between tobacco chewers (Group A) and control group (Group C), it was observed that there was not much difference in salivary pH between the groups. The mean value of Group A (tobacco chewers) of salivary pH was calculated as 7.59 with 0.70 SD. For the control group (Group C), the mean value was obtained as 7.42 with 0.96 standard deviation. The independent Conclusion: Frequent tobacco use impacts oral health, often unknown to the users. This study found altered perception of bitter taste in tobacco users. However, salivary pH and SFR showed minimal variation.

Indexed as

pHsalivasalivary flow ratesmokeless tobaccotaste perceptiontobacco

Identifiers

PMID39949669
PMCPMC11819621

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.