ArticleMalaysian family physician : the official journal of the Academy of Family Physicians of Malaysia2025
Disease perception, treatment-seeking behaviour and psychosocial impact of acne vulgaris among university students - A cross-sectional study.
Article in Malaysian family physician : the official journal of the Academy of Family Physicians of Malaysia, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The Prevalence and Characteristics of Adult Female Acne: A Cross-sectional Population-based Study.Acta dermato-venereologica · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Acne is a common chronic inflammatory disease. Misconceptions hinder effective management. This study aimed to explore disease perception, treatment-seeking behaviour and the psychosocial impact of acne. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted in four universities. A self-administered questionnaire was developed and validated. During clinical examination, acne severity was determined using the Comprehensive Acne Severity Scale (CASS) and psychosocial impact using the Cardiff Acne Disability Index (CADI). Results: Four hundred students with acne aged 20±1.62 years participated, among whom 62.5% were women. The self-perceived acne severity matched the CASS score in 54.4% of the participants but was worse in 37.5%. Approximately 80.5% correctly recognised acne as a disease, while beliefs about its chronicity varied. The aggravating factors were food (92.8%), genetic predisposition (92.8%), stress (91.3%), hygiene (86.3%) and menstruation (84.8%). The information sources were families (79.7%), online social media platforms (60.2%) and friends (58.5%). Doctor consultation was significantly associated with correct disease perception, severe disease and higher psychosocial impact. Cost was the commonest deterrent for seeking (63.8%) and discontinuing treatment (43.2%). The psychosocial impact was predominantly mild (71%). The CADI domains mostly affected were feelings and psychological state. The clinical (odd ratio [OR] =2.29, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.45, 3.61) and self-perceived acne severity (OR=4.83, 95% CI=2.79, 8.35) predicted a higher psychosocial impact. Conclusion: Misconceptions about acne as a disease were not prevalent, and aggravating factors other than food were correctly identified. Common information sources may further perpetuate misconceptions. Financial treatment barriers should be addressed especially in patients with severe acne and psychosocial impacts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.