ArticleClinical case reports2025
Cold Ceramic for Repairing Root Perforations: A Case Report.
Article in Clinical case reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes Following Unintentional Extrusion of Cold Ceramic: A Case Series of Three Patients.Clinical case reports · 2026Article
- Root Perforations: Etiology, Diagnosis, Prognostic Factors, and Contemporary Repair Materials: A Narrative Review.Dentistry journal · 2026Review
- Pulpotomy for an Immature Permanent Tooth With Symptomatic Irreversible Pulpitis Using Cold Ceramic.Case reports in dentistry · 2026Article
- Article
- Non-Surgical Treatment of Bilateral Dens Invaginatus in Maxillary Lateral Incisors: A Case Report.Clinical case reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Root perforation may happen pathologically or iatrogenically at any stage of endodontic treatment. Repairing a Perforation can be challenging and can negatively affect the prognosis of the treatment. The prognosis depends on various factors, including the size and site of the perforation, the presence of microorganisms, and the time lapse between injury and repair. One crucial factor is using a suitable material with favorable biocompatibility, moisture tolerance, and sealing abilities. Thus, choosing the suitable perforation sealing material can significantly affect the outcomes. Many materials have been suggested for perforation repair. However, searching for an ideal material continues, indicating the complicated nature of root perforations. In this study, three patients, two male and one female, received treatment for root perforation, each varying in the prognosis determinant factors. All cases were managed non-surgically with cold ceramic (CC) as the repairing material. After follow-up, they were clinically and radiographically examined, and all three cases revealed relatively complete healing of the tissues and no signs or symptoms of inflammation. The results obtained from the presented cases indicated CC's sealing ability, biocompatibility, moisture tolerance, and bone and periodontium regeneration, which are essential for successful perforation repair. The favorable healing of the perforation and the elimination of inflammation in every case, as well as the existing literature, support the use of CC as a suitable material for sealing perforations. However, additional clinical research is recommended to further understand CC's qualities and potential.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.