ArticleOptica2024
Acoustic-feedback wavefront-adapted photoacoustic microscopy.
Article in Optica, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Photoacoustic Microscopy for Multiscale Biological System Visualization and Clinical Translation.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Review
- Tartrazine-enabled optical clearing for in vivo optical resolution photoacoustic microscopy.Biomedical optics express · 2025Article
- Deep Learning to Localize Photoacoustic Sources in Three Dimensions: Theory and Implementation.IEEE transactions on ultrasonics, ferroelectrics, and frequency control · 2025Article
- Sound Out the Deep Clarity: Super-Resolution Photoacoustic Imaging at Depths.IEEE transactions on ultrasonics, ferroelectrics, and frequency control · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Optical microscopy is indispensable to biomedical research and clinical investigations. As all molecules absorb light, optical-resolution photoacoustic microscopy (PAM) is an important tool to image molecules at high resolution without labeling. However, due to tissue-induced optical aberration, the imaging quality degrades with increasing imaging depth. To mitigate this effect, we develop an imaging method, called acoustic-feedback wavefront-adapted PAM (AWA-PAM), to dynamically compensate for tissue-induced aberration at depths. In contrast to most existing adaptive optics assisted optical microscopy, AWA-PAM employs acoustic signals rather than optical signals to indirectly determine the optimized wavefront. To demonstrate this technique, we imaged zebrafish embryos and mouse ears
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.