Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39949523›Full record

ArticleHealth science reports2025

Factors Influencing Cervical Cancer Screening: A Cross-Sectional Study Among Ethnically Diverse Women in the Kumasi Metropolis of Ghana.

Abdul-K Abubakari, Janet Gross, Ibrahim D Kwaku, Isaac K Boateng

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health science reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Abdul-K AbubakariUniversity Hospital, Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology Kumasi Ghana.ORCID 0000-0003-1115-0736
Janet GrossMorehead State University Morehead Kentucky USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7012-4629
Ibrahim D KwakuKumasi Center for Collaborative Research Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology Kumasi Ghana.ORCID 0000-0003-0122-6469
Isaac K BoatengUniversity Hospital, Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology Kumasi Ghana.ORCID 0009-0005-6033-3127

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Globally, Ghana is one of the countries with the greatest cervical cancer (CC) burdens and mortality rates. Available research has focused primarily on women's experiences in the general population neglecting factors that influence cervical cancer screening (CCS) among ethnically diverse populations in Ghana. Aim: This study explored the factors influencing CCS among ethnically diverse women in the Kumasi Metropolis of Ghana. Method: From April to June 2023, a community-based cross-sectional study was carried out in the Aboabo and Asawase communities of the Ashanti Region. Binary and multivariable logistic regressions were employed to determine the relationships between the dependent and independent variables. Outcome variables with Results: Habits, knowledge, perceived benefits, and facilitating factors influenced CCS among ethnically diverse women. An overall self-reported CCS rate of 7.2% ( Conclusion: Poor knowledge, lower perceived benefits of CCS, and weak facilitating factors were identified as barriers to CCS. Implementing national CCS and vaccination campaigns to improve awareness, and screening to reduce women's risk is encouraged.

Indexed as

cervical cancercervical cancer screeninghealthcare providerhuman papilloma virusmigrantsmigrant women

Identifiers

PMID39949523
PMCPMC11821460

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.